Actually the front office has sorta been in this scenerio...
I am sure everyone remembers Wallace being the 3rd WR when we had Holmes. We all saw how he was going to be great, sort of what we are seeing from Brown and I would even say Sanders (if he can get a full year in). I also remember going to the season with a lot of questions regarding our WRs.
We only had and ever aging Ward, a potential star in Wallace, with a lot of questions marks if he was going to be able to step up and replace Santonio and 2 rookies in Brown and Sanders. To make matters worse we had no Ben for the first 4 games.
As it turned out, we went to the Superbowl. Not a bad return on trading SA, huh?
I still wonder till today, if Holmes wasn't such a mess, would we of made that trade to the jets or anyone else. The trade was made to get rid of his character, but add in the fact he was going into his final year of his contract. Would we would of signed him to that big contract anyways? And we had the promise of Wallace in the wings. Now that part sounds familiar, huh? SA=MW=AB
Also we got think under Halley, he is going to bring a more methodical offense and not only live on the BIG PLAYS that we previous had. How many times in the past year, we would go 3 and out, because we didn't get that big play especailly in crunch time. We had the philosophy of BA, "liveby the sword die by the sword".
In other words, we will be more efficient under Halley, and that would definitely mean more REDZONE TDs.
I am sure everyone remembers Wallace being the 3rd WR when we had Holmes. We all saw how he was going to be great, sort of what we are seeing from Brown and I would even say Sanders (if he can get a full year in). I also remember going to the season with a lot of questions regarding our WRs.
We only had and ever aging Ward, a potential star in Wallace, with a lot of questions marks if he was going to be able to step up and replace Santonio and 2 rookies in Brown and Sanders. To make matters worse we had no Ben for the first 4 games.
As it turned out, we went to the Superbowl. Not a bad return on trading SA, huh?
I still wonder till today, if Holmes wasn't such a mess, would we of made that trade to the jets or anyone else. The trade was made to get rid of his character, but add in the fact he was going into his final year of his contract. Would we would of signed him to that big contract anyways? And we had the promise of Wallace in the wings. Now that part sounds familiar, huh? SA=MW=AB
Also we got think under Halley, he is going to bring a more methodical offense and not only live on the BIG PLAYS that we previous had. How many times in the past year, we would go 3 and out, because we didn't get that big play especailly in crunch time. We had the philosophy of BA, "liveby the sword die by the sword".
In other words, we will be more efficient under Halley, and that would definitely mean more REDZONE TDs.


Comment