In the replays, #77 of the P*ts is shown in the endzone jumping for the ball thinking he has a chance to catch it - clearly revealing he was a potential target. So...was it ever announced he was an eligible receiver? If not, he was an ineligible WR downfield & him touching the ball would've been illegal...did the refs miss this or did the broadcast miss it?
Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
Collapse
X
-
Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...Tags: None -
Re: Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
the refs did NOT announce him as eligible. i didn't notice that part of the play.2014 MNF EXEC CHAMPION!!! -
Re: Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
If he didn't actually touch the ball, is it still a penalty?
We got our "6-PACK" - time to work on a CASE!
HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!Comment
-
Re: Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
Yes, it would be a penalty if he wasn't announced. ineligible man downfield.Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.Comment
-
Re: Question about the P*ts 2nd TD...
I thought it was #87 that prevented Gay from knocking that ball down. I don't think it was a lineman.Originally posted by Steel LifeIn the replays, #77 of the P*ts is shown in the endzone jumping for the ball thinking he has a chance to catch it - clearly revealing he was a potential target. So...was it ever announced he was an eligible receiver? If not, he was an ineligible WR downfield & him touching the ball would've been illegal...did the refs miss this or did the broadcast miss it?As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.
but Go Steelers!!!

Comment

Comment