Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35649

    Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

    Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

    By: Mark Madden Beaver County Times
    Sunday November 28, 2010 11:48 PM




    The 151 yards gained by Rashard Mendenhall (among 206 total posted by the Steelers’ rushing attack) will be hailed as a true renaissance of the team’s ground game.

    By fools, that is.

    The Steelers’ offensive game plan should be scribbled in crayon on old-fashioned brown-paper shopping bags. Child’s play or insanity, take your pick.

    Invoke The Bus all you want. Franco and Rocky, too. John Henry Johnson, if you’d like to jump in the Wayback Machine. The Steelers are minimizing their primary offensive weapon, Ben Roethlisberger, for the sake of doing things granddaddy’s way.

    The Steelers ran the ball on 54 percent of their offensive plays during yesterday’s 19-16 overtime win at Buffalo. They passed for 220 yards, rushed for 206.

    Balance, right?

    Yeah. But at what price?

    The big explosion on the ground came against the NFL’s worst rushing defense.

    The Steelers possessed the ball for almost 25 minutes of the first half, but had only a 13-0 lead to show for it. There’s a fine line between grinding clock and wasting time.

    That’s just not the way football is anymore. Simply isn’t.

    If it took nearly 73 minutes to make the Bills 2-9, what will the same approach do against an elite team in the playoffs? Against a team with a quarterback like Tom Brady who needs only minimal possession time to pick you apart and put up points?

    The Steelers don’t have a defense worth handing the game over to anymore. A 13-0 halftime lead wasted, two fourth-quarter leads blown. The defense fades as each game grows old, but the Steelers’ strategy refuses to acknowledge that.

    The Steelers got lucky yesterday. Buffalo receiver Stevie Johnson had the victory in his hands in overtime, but let an easy touchdown catch slip through his grasp.

    This is no win to be proud of. Flags hurt the Steelers again as they were penalized 10 times for 107 yards. As was the case against Oakland, several calls seemed ludicrous. NFL games are being badly over-officiated. That hurts the Steelers more than most.

    Roethlisberger found a way to impact the game. No team can totally stop him. Not the opposition, not the Steelers.

    Roethlisberger was sacked five times and enjoyed minimal protection. Chris Kemoeatu should carry a red cape and yell, “Ole!”

    But Roethlisberger threw no interceptions, completed some smart passes, displayed outstanding elusiveness despite the sack total and manufactured an epic 18-yard scramble on third-and-17 to prolong a fourth-quarter drive that culminated in a Shaun Suisham field goal.

    Speaking of Suisham, what a debut. Four-for-four, including a 41-yarder in OT. He’ll be the toast of Sheetz men’s rooms everywhere. This week.

    There’s no denying 8-3. But there’s also no denying the Steelers were somewhat shy of competitive in losses to New England and New Orleans. There’s also no denying the road to playoff success often goes through elite quarterbacks.

    The Steelers won’t beat elite teams/quarterbacks with the game plan they choose to exercise. If it boils down to the running game and the defense against, say, Brady, you have to rely on Brady having a bad day. Not very likely.

    Roethlisberger could beat Brady or Brees in a shootout. He might not, but he could. Roethlisberger would overwhelm Mark Sanchez if a game against the New York Jets turned high-scoring. Any way it’s sliced, Roethlisberger is the Steelers’ best bet.

    But philosophically, the Steelers prefer to play low stakes. Prefer to think slow and steady wins the race when that’s never been less true in NFL history.

    It’s hard to believe this is what offensive coordinator Bruce Arians wants. It’s hard to believe this is what Roethlisberger wants. It’s just hard to believe, period.

    Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM (105.9).

    [url="http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sports_details/article/1424/2010/november/28/monday-madden-steelers-neednt-seek-offensive-balance.html"]http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sport ... lance.html[/url]
  • Crash
    Legend
    • Apr 2009
    • 5008

    #2
    Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

    The defense fades as each game grows old, but the Steelers’ strategy refuses to acknowledge that.
    And not using Jason Worilds as a rush end with his speed when we insist on rushing 4 pass rushers is a damn joke.

    Comment

    • Captain Lemming
      Legend
      • Jun 2008
      • 16041

      #3
      Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

      Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
      Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

      The Steelers won’t beat elite teams/quarterbacks with the game plan they choose to exercise. If it boils down to the running game and the defense against, say, Brady, you have to rely on Brady having a bad day. Not very likely.

      Roethlisberger could beat Brady or Brees in a shootout. He might not, but he could. Roethlisberger would overwhelm Mark Sanchez if a game against the New York Jets turned high-scoring. Any way it’s sliced, Roethlisberger is the Steelers’ best bet.
      49 passes in our worst loss of the season against the Pats puts this myth to death..

      The Giants beat the most explosive Pats passing attack ever in the SB. How did the do it? Balance.
      sigpic



      In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

      TCFCLTC-
      The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

      Comment

      • Flasteel
        Hall of Famer
        • May 2008
        • 4004

        #4
        Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

        Wow...Madden truly is an idiot. He's more interested in stroking Roethlisberger than he is in gaining an understanding of the game.
        sigpic

        Comment

        • aggiebones
          Pro Bowler
          • Jan 2009
          • 1427

          #5
          Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

          Wow, he calls other people fools. What a joke.

          We have to run at the minimum for protection to Ben.
          That OL is a shell of its recently mediocre self.
          The Steelers have a rash of very bad injuries to its OL and DL. Not a good formula for winning a Super Bowl. Their only chance is to shorten the game and keep the ball away from the enemy.
          Sorry Mark, but who are these weapons you speak of that we are wasting? Miler is a real good TE, partly because he is a very good blocker. We cobble together some solid WRs, but some of their strength is their blocking. Wallace is developing nicely, but we can't have him run 30 fly patterns a game. Ward is old, but still ticking. Plus a couple rookie WRs that are going to develop, but can't be relied on yet. Yea, STJohnson dropped a potential game winner for Buffalo, but for us Sanders dropped a game icer too. You can't rely on rookies.

          So he complains that we ran a bunch against one of the worst rush defending team in the league? That is asinine. When someone is bad at something, you exploit it!
          Wow, he's pretty much opposite from correct. To all those that agree with him, get you lunch box and hurry to the bus stop, you need some more schoolin.

          Comment

          • Mister Pittsburgh
            Hall of Famer
            • Jul 2008
            • 3674

            #6
            Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

            Bills adjusted at halftime to stop the run. We didn't adjust, thus one TD vs. the worst D in football.
            @_Hellgrammite

            Comment

            • proudpittsburgher
              Pro Bowler
              • May 2008
              • 2377

              #7
              Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

              I may not agree with him completely, but this offense seems disjointed because they are trying to force the run. We don't need a 50/50 split fellas. We have a franchise quarterback and quite possibly a hall of famer. Let's use him to his full capacity.
              http://i34.tinypic.com/nxj0iu.gif
              http://i42.tinypic.com/dm5hr7.jpg
              http://i42.tinypic.com/9awen7.gif

              Comment

              • Mister Pittsburgh
                Hall of Famer
                • Jul 2008
                • 3674

                #8
                Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                Originally posted by proudpittsburgher
                I may not agree with him completely, but this offense seems disjointed because they are trying to force the run. We don't need a 50/50 split fellas. We have a franchise quarterback and quite possibly a hall of famer. Let's use him to his full capacity.
                Yeah, I think it is pretty funny that people think all passes are created equal. How many times did you see the Patriots come out against our D and run, run, and then on 3rd down sit there and let us swap out our personel, only to have Brady line up under center, take a 5 step drop, have his WR all run patterns 20 yards downfield?

                Against the rush with a crap line time is a premium and the time it takes Ben to drop back, and then wait till our WR come open far downfield, is a complete waste. The only time we consistently move the ball on any team, is our 2 minute offense. Our full time offense should be designed around this sort of mentality. Sorry boys, but even if every single one of our starting offensive linemen was healthy, we aren't running on playoff teams.
                @_Hellgrammite

                Comment

                • feltdizz
                  Legend
                  • May 2008
                  • 27531

                  #9
                  Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                  nothing wrong with running against a bad run defense....

                  I knew this game would be a problem because the Bills are not as bad as there record and I don't think we play as well as our record against this type of team.

                  We just aren't a good team when up by 10+ points... we find ways to make most games entertaining but also frustrating.

                  Props to Sushi.. I doubt skippy would have made 4 FG's yesterday.
                  Steelers 27
                  Rats 16

                  Comment

                  • SteelTorch
                    Pro Bowler
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 1361

                    #10
                    Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                    Hate to play devil's advocate, but I agree with most of what he says.

                    Our offense has too many problems to be counted on against the best teams. As for our running game, far too many want to see us run the ball just to run it, because they think it will magically make us better. No. We need to run the ball effectively, and when it will help us win. Not just because the old timers want to see us go smashmouth.
                    http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/310/torchsigoe6.jpg

                    Comment

                    • Mister Pittsburgh
                      Hall of Famer
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 3674

                      #11
                      Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                      Originally posted by Captain Lemming
                      Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                      Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                      The Steelers won’t beat elite teams/quarterbacks with the game plan they choose to exercise. If it boils down to the running game and the defense against, say, Brady, you have to rely on Brady having a bad day. Not very likely.

                      Roethlisberger could beat Brady or Brees in a shootout. He might not, but he could. Roethlisberger would overwhelm Mark Sanchez if a game against the New York Jets turned high-scoring. Any way it’s sliced, Roethlisberger is the Steelers’ best bet.
                      49 passes in our worst loss of the season against the Pats puts this myth to death..

                      The Giants beat the most explosive Pats passing attack ever in the SB. How did the do it? Balance.
                      We were passing our balls off in the 4th quarter when we put up 23 points. Sure, they were in prevent, but we scored by passing. When we were mostly 50-50, against a good team, we put up 3.
                      @_Hellgrammite

                      Comment

                      • steelblood
                        Hall of Famer
                        • May 2008
                        • 4166

                        #12
                        Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                        Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
                        Bills adjusted at halftime to stop the run. We didn't adjust, thus one TD vs. the worst D in football.
                        We had a simple game plan. Attack the other team's weakness. It was a good gameplan, but we should have used play action more effectively.

                        And Kemo was truly terrible yesterday. I really hope it was injury related. If he plays like that against the ravens and Gregg, Cody, and Ngata, we'll be in a lot of trouble.
                        Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

                        Comment

                        • aggiebones
                          Pro Bowler
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 1427

                          #13
                          Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                          FIRST point:
                          Ugh, you guys do know the weather is going to turn ugly soon. Places that we may have to play in the playoffs:
                          New York, New England, Baltimore!
                          Do these seem like great places to HAVE to throw the ball in December/January?

                          We BETTER learn how to run the ball 25+/- times a game come playoff time.



                          SECOND point:
                          We have ALOT of replacement OL, most of which are better suited to run the ball. They have little chemistry, which makes pass blocking harder.



                          Please stop saying we need to throw to this 'great' WR corp. I like them, but Ward is old, Wallace is learning to be complete and we have 2 rookies or Randle El. This is not some uber talented corp. Its solid, barely.

                          Ben is very good, but with that OL, he better have the play action to succeed for 3 AFC playoff games. And for those that don't understand, the play action pass doesn't work if you aren't successful running the ball.

                          Comment

                          • Crash
                            Legend
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 5008

                            #14
                            Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                            Forcing balance is only half the problem.

                            It's the predictability based off the formation.

                            You know whats coming as soon as the formation is on the field.

                            Comment

                            • proudpittsburgher
                              Pro Bowler
                              • May 2008
                              • 2377

                              #15
                              Re: Monday Madden: Steelers needn't seek offensive balance

                              Originally posted by aggiebones
                              And for those that don't understand, the play action pass doesn't work if you aren't successful running the ball.
                              I guess you can count me in as one of those who doesn't understand. See Manning, Peyton.
                              http://i34.tinypic.com/nxj0iu.gif
                              http://i42.tinypic.com/dm5hr7.jpg
                              http://i42.tinypic.com/9awen7.gif

                              Comment

                              Working...