Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35649

    Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

    Analyzing the Offensive Line: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

    Posted on October 28, 2010 by JJ


    Another week, another win. When the Steelers are 5-1, there’s no reason to complain. And when it comes to the offensive line, it’s hard to not be impressed with the Steelers’ depth this year — nine different offensive linemen have seen significant time.

    Pittsburgh had to rely on that depth again Sunday. Flozell Adams went down, which forced the Steelers to turn to Jonathan Scott. And Ramon Foster split time with Doug Legursky at guard.

    But with that caveat out of the way, this wasn’t a good Sunday for the offensive line. Pittsburgh struggled to generate holes for Rashard Mendenhall. And when it came to pass protection, Ben Roethlisberger got plenty of chances to prove he’ll stand in the pocket with a pass rusher ready to light him up.

    Here’s the breakdown of the pass blocking.

    PASSING PLAYS
    Player Success Total PCT
    Mendenhall 3 3 100.00%
    Miller 7 7 100.00%
    Redman 3 3 100.00%
    Scott 15 17 88.24%
    Foster 6 7 85.71%
    Starks 27 32 84.38%
    Pouncey 26 31 83.87%
    Legursky 20 24 83.33%
    Adams 11 14 78.57%
    Kemoeatu 24 31 77.42%
    Spaeth 0 1 0.00%

    And here are the pressures and sacks allowed.

    Player Pressures Sacks
    Scott 3
    Adams 3
    Legursky 2
    Starks 2 .5
    Kemoeatu 1 1.5
    Spaeth 1
    Pouncey 0.5
    Moore .5

    The sack shared between Pouncey and Kemoeatu is hard to assess. Cameron Wake started on the outside, then looped inside. Chris Kemoeatu was occupied with one of the defensive linemen while Pouncey slid over to help out Doug Legursky. Now Kemoeatu could have handed his man off to Max Starks, or Pouncey could have stayed aware of a man looping inside, but it’s hard to say which of the two was responsible for picking up Wake.

    On the second sack, Kemoeatu was driven into the backfield. On the third one, Mewelde Moore didn’t see a defensive back blitzing from the backside, while Max Starks stayed on his initial man instead of handing off. Again, on that one there is some question whether it was the play/line call or the player who was at fault — it’s hard to say without knowing what was called — so you could argue that play wasn’t the linemen/running back’s fault.

    RUNNING PLAYS
    Kemoeatu 21 25 84.00%
    Spaeth 10 12 83.33%
    Adams 9 11 81.82%
    Pouncey 20 25 80.00%
    Starks 20 25 80.00%
    Miller 19 24 79.17%
    Foster 5 7 71.43%
    Legursky 12 18 66.67%
    Scott 9 14 64.29%
    Johnson 2 6 33.33%
    Redman 0 1 0.00%

    We’ll dive into the problems with the running game, when we look player by player, but this sums up the Steelers problems. On first down, the Steelers ran the ball 11 times. They gained only 25 yards (2.28 ypc), with a long gain of six yards.

    OVERALL PLAYS
    Mendenhall 3 3 100.00%
    Miller 26 31 83.87%
    Starks 47 57 82.46%
    Pouncey 46 56 82.14%
    Kemoeatu 45 56 80.36%
    Adams 20 25 80.00%
    Foster 11 14 78.57%
    Scott 24 31 77.42%
    Spaeth 10 13 76.92%
    Legursky 32 42 76.19%
    Redman 3 4 75.00%
    Johnson 2 6 33.33%

    And now on to the players.

    Max Starks: I am starting to wonder if Starks is still recovering from the ankle injury he suffered in early September. He’s still strong with long arms, but he is having some problems with his lateral movement. But his biggest problem is maintaining his block. On four of the five blocks he blew in the running game, he found and put an initial punch on his man. But each time his man managed to shed his block to make a tackle.

    In the passing game, Starks’ problems were all over the board. He was beaten to the outside once, to the inside once, and he was once driven back because he lost his leverage against a bull rush.

    Doug Legursky: Legursky’s numbers look pretty bad this week, but some of it can be credited to the play of the Dolphins’ linebackers. On three of his six bad blocks in the running game, Legursky couldn’t get to a linebacker before he reacted and flowed to the hole. That’s a problem, but it’s not always the lineman’s problem. Sometimes your opponent makes a good play. He was also flagged for holding, which is a bigger problem.

    In the passing game, the problems are much more worrying. Legursky found himself beaten off the snap on several plays, which forced him to hang on for another holding penalty.

    Maurkice Pouncey: This wasn’t one of Pouncey’s best games, but once again he was one of the steadiest performers on the Steelers’ line. As I mentioned earlier, one of the dings on Pouncey for pass blocking could have possibly been someone else’s fault. In pass blocking he also was beaten off the snap once, was driven into the backfield once, made a good initial block but was shed too easily in another, and failed to pick up a looping defensive lineman on another play.

    In run blocking, like Legursky, his biggest problem was the play of linebacker Karlos Dansby. Dansby shed his block to make a tackle once, was bowled over by Dansby on another play and failed to get to him quick enough to block him on a third play. He was also driven into the backfield on one play and was shed by the nose tackle on a fifth play.

    Chris Kemoeatu: When Kemoeatu figured out who he was supposed to block, he was as good as usual. But he did have some serious problems in figuring out who to block.

    On five plays, by my count, Kemoeatu either blocked no one or was late to make his decision on who to block which led to problems in blocking his man. One of those is questionable since the Wake sack is hard to determine, as was mentioned above.

    Flozell Adams: Adams left the game relatively early after he suffered an ankle injury, but before that he was having one of his worst games of the year. In only 14 pass plays, Adams gave up three quarterback pressures (one of which he shared with Matt Spaeth). In run blocking, Adams was beaten of the snap once and once just stood around and blocked no one.

    Jonathan Scott: Scott played more than half of the game in relief of Adams. He’s proven to be a better pass blocker than I expected — he blew his blocks in pass blocking on two of his first four snaps, then shut down his man for most of the rest of the game. His one other pass-blocking miscue came when he was beaten for a quarterback pressure by a speed rush in the third quarter. Of his three pressures, one came because of assignment confusion, another came on a bull rush and the third came on a speed rush.

    In the running game, Scott had bigger problems, but there was no consistent thread. He was beaten off the snap once, he was shed after making an initial block on another, he was driven into the backfield on a third play, and he couldn’t get to a linebacker on a fourth.

    Ramon Foster: We’ve mentioned it before, but the Steelers’ biggest asset on the offensive line is its depth. It’s not that Trai Essex or Doug Legursky is a Pro Bowler, but the reality is that Pittsburgh could lose both of them and still be OK. I’m not convinced that Foster couldn’t play just as well as Legursky if he got the same amount of playing time.

    Foster was inserted after Legursky’s worse series of the game, then he returned for spot duty later. He wasn’t great, but he wasn’t any worse than Legursky either. He was beaten to the outside once in pass blocking, beaten to the inside once in run blocking and once he was driven backwards in run blocking.

    [url="http://www.steelerslounge.com/2010/10/analyzing-offensive-line-trai-essex/"]http://www.steelerslounge.com/2010/10/a ... rai-essex/[/url]
  • SanAntonioSteelerFan
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 8361

    #2
    Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

    Wow, what an analysis! It's like reading Kugler's game film break down.

    Speaking of which, we're pretty lucky to have Kugler - the O line could have been a disaster this year, what with all the injuries, in the hands of a less talented coach.


    We got our "6-PACK" - time to work on a CASE!

    HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!

    Comment

    • steelblood
      Hall of Famer
      • May 2008
      • 4166

      #3
      Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

      Originally posted by SanAntonioSteelerFan
      Wow, what an analysis! It's like reading Kugler's game film break down.

      Speaking of which, we're pretty lucky to have Kugler - the O line could have been a disaster this year, what with all the injuries, in the hands of a less talented coach.
      I agree, it is impressive. It is nice to quantify these things. The only problem I have is that calling each play a success or failure can sometimes be misleading. So, the percentages may not tell the story. For example, a success in this formula could be anything from a benign stalemate to a pancake block. In this way, I believe guys like Pouncey and Adams (who often win convincingly or combo well to other targets) are being undervalued and guys like Starks and Essex (who don't often win convincingly) may be overvalued - especially in the running analysis.
      Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

      Comment

      • fezziwig
        Hall of Famer
        • Jan 2009
        • 3515

        #4
        Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

        It's been musical chairs with our o-line this season. We all know that our o-linemen would hardly get consideration to be starters on many other teams ( except Pouncey ) . Why is everyone surprised when these guys fail at times ?

        Comment

        • steelblood
          Hall of Famer
          • May 2008
          • 4166

          #5
          Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

          Originally posted by fezziwig
          It's been musical chairs with our o-line this season. We all know that our o-linemen would hardly get consideration to be starters on many other teams ( except Pouncey ) . Why is everyone surprised when these guys fail at times ?
          Who is surprised?

          I think most realize that this line has played about as well as we could expect so far.
          Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

          Comment

          • fezziwig
            Hall of Famer
            • Jan 2009
            • 3515

            #6
            Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

            I'm speaking about the complaining of the running game.

            Comment

            • Chavezz
              Backup
              • May 2008
              • 465

              #7
              Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

              I think it's a foregone conclusion at this point that D line and O line are going to be the focus in the draft next year. When your 3rd string OG isn't much different than your starter that's a problem imo.

              I'm going to have to see what OG's are free agents next year, we might want to go that route as well.

              And now that I'm thinking about this, why the heck don't we try to run the ball off freaking tackle!!
              http://www.planetsteelers.com/cpg141...serpics/cv.jpg

              Comment

              • fezziwig
                Hall of Famer
                • Jan 2009
                • 3515

                #8
                Re: Analyzing the OL: So When Is Trai Essex Back?

                Originally posted by Chavezz
                I think it's a foregone conclusion at this point that D line and O line are going to be the focus in the draft next year. When your 3rd string OG isn't much different than your starter that's a problem imo.

                I'm going to have to see what OG's are free agents next year, we might want to go that route as well.

                And now that I'm thinking about this, why the heck don't we try to run the ball off freaking tackle!!

                Comment

                Working...