Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35648

    Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

    Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older





    LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. — Ask inside linebacker and co-captain James Farrior about the uneven performance of the Steelers defense last season, and he doesn't hesitate to point the finger of blame at himself.

    "I left a lot of plays out on the field. There were some situations I could have played a lot better," Farrior said Monday following a three-hour workout at ESPN Wide World of Sports. "No matter what anybody says, we had a bad year. I didn't play as well as I wanted to play, and I know a lot of guys on the team felt the same way."

    Finishing 9-7 a year after winning Super Bowl XLIII, the Steelers missed the playoffs by one game, For Farrior, a player accustomed to an overabundance of success during 13 NFL seasons, not reaching the postseason was unacceptable.

    Especially when Farrior didn't perform up to his normal lofty standards.

    At 35 and the second-oldest player on the team (behind quarterback Charlie Batch), Farrior suggests he's getting better, not older. He also predicts a turnaround not only for himself, but for a defense that's anxious to reclaim its status among the league's most dominant units.

    Farrior said media criticism regarding his individual performance — despite leading the team in tackles four consecutive seasons — has given him unexpected motivation.

    "That adds fuel to the fire. That's one of the motivating factors for me — how bad we played last year. You're going to do everything in your power not to let that happen again," said Farrior, who is entering the third year of a five-year contract. "Whenever people doubt you, say negative stuff about you, as a competitor, you try to prove everybody wrong. It makes you want to work that much harder.

    "I don't feel like the oldest guy on the team. Age is just a number. I don't want to put a time limit on anything. As long as my body feels healthy, as long as I'm mentally into it, I want to keep playing."

    That's why Farrior, who calls defensive signals, was pushing himself under the watchful eye of speed and conditioning guru Tom Shaw only 11 days before the opening of training camp.

    Based on yesterday's workout, Farrior didn't act his age. He didn't take extra water breaks in the stifling heat and humidity and went all-out in every drill.

    "That's why I come down here with Tom. He knows how to get people in shape," Farrior said. "He treats everybody the same. We know when he gives us a drill, it's going to be very beneficial for us."

    Farrior appears determined to bounce back from last season. He remains confident he hasn't lost a step and sees no reason why he shouldn't be on the field for passing downs.

    Dating to 2001 in his final season with the New York Jets before joining the Steelers as a free agent, Farrior has started 140 of a possible 144 games. He hasn't missed a start since 2005.

    "That's my goal, to be out there as much as I can," said Farrior, who made it clear he believes he's the best player for the position. "I never want to come off the field. As far as the coaching goes, that's up to them what they decide to do."

    Even after all these years, Farrior still believes his game has room for improvement.

    "If I didn't feel that way, I wouldn't be out here busting my butt every day. If I didn't think I could get better and help this team try to get to another championship, I would give it up," Farrior said. "I understand that I'm getting older and I'm not getting any faster or stronger, but as long as I can maintain that high level of play, I still want to play."

    [url="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_691133.html"]http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_691133.html[/url]
  • Steelers>NFL
    Backup
    • May 2010
    • 488

    #2
    Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

    He is still getting old. And definately getting slower. Still smart too!

    Comment

    • ter1230_4
      Backup
      • Feb 2010
      • 199

      #3
      Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

      Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.

      Comment

      • Oviedo
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 23824

        #4
        Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

        Originally posted by ter1230_4
        Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
        I wonder if on third down if he switched roles with Timmons with Timmons being the coverage guy and Farrior being the run stop guy if that would keep him on the field.

        Bottomline is that he did take a step back last year and this is probably his last.
        "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

        Comment

        • cruzer8
          Starter
          • Nov 2009
          • 977

          #5
          Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

          I think the return of Smith and Polamalu will help Farrior's coverage abilities.

          Comment

          • RuthlessBurgher
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 33208

            #6
            Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

            Originally posted by Oviedo
            Originally posted by ter1230_4
            Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
            I wonder if on third down if he switched roles with Timmons with Timmons being the coverage guy and Farrior being the run stop guy if that would keep him on the field.

            Bottomline is that he did take a step back last year and this is probably his last.
            In nickel, I'd rather put Timmons and Harrison next to each other in the middle, with Woodley and Worilds as rush ends.
            Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

            Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

            We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

            We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

            Comment

            • flippy
              Legend
              • Dec 2008
              • 17088

              #7
              Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

              Key is deserving of more playing time imho.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • NC Steeler Fan
                Starter
                • May 2008
                • 642

                #8
                Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                I have to agree with Cruzer8.

                I think that our D had a cast of core characters that, if missing one key piece, lost a lot of chemistry on the field.

                You could say that players ought to be able to adjust to whomever's in the mix, but I think they were all shocked and thrown off balance when Troy went down and never really recovered.

                Easy to say after the fact, I know, but it just seemed all too clear we were never the same without him.

                Maybe if, heaven forbid, we lose another component this year, it won't be such a shock that they don't realize how quickly they have to shake it off and adjust.
                http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w...URES/NCFAN.jpg

                "18 and D'OH!" ---headline on NFL.com 2/5/08

                Comment

                • pittpete
                  Legend
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 6825

                  #9
                  Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                  Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
                  Id have to agree also.
                  Two that come to mind are the Bengal game on 4th down with thier FB and Ray Rice against the Ravens.
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • cruzer8
                    Starter
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 977

                    #10
                    Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                    Originally posted by pittpete
                    Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
                    Id have to agree also.
                    Two that come to mind are the Bengal game on 4th down with thier FB and Ray Rice against the Ravens.
                    What Rice did to Farrior he does to a lot of LBers. He had 78 catches for 702 yards last year.

                    Comment

                    • ter1230_4
                      Backup
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 199

                      #11
                      Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                      Originally posted by cruzer8
                      Originally posted by pittpete
                      Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
                      Id have to agree also.
                      Two that come to mind are the Bengal game on 4th down with thier FB and Ray Rice against the Ravens.
                      What Rice did to Farrior he does to a lot of LBers. He had 78 catches for 702 yards last year.
                      Maybe, but let's take a little closer look at that particular situation. The Ratbirds were down by three points with about three and a half minutes left, had a couple of timeouts left, and were facing a 4th down and 5 on their side of the 50 yard line. Harbaugh sent on the punting unit, which given the situation is what an NFL team would do about 99% of the time. That is especially true given the Raven's confidence in their defense. All of a sudden Harbaugh calls a timeout, and then sends his offense back out to go for it on 4th down. If they go for it and don't get it, the Ravens have basically lost the game. The only thing they can hope for is to get the ball back deep in their own territory with no timeouts and less than 2 minutes to go. There is one and only one possible conclusion that can be drawn--Harbaugh had a play that, from watching the film, he KNEW would work, and that play was to throw to Rice because Farrior could no longer cover backs.

                      Comment

                      • cruzer8
                        Starter
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 977

                        #12
                        Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                        Originally posted by ter1230_4
                        Originally posted by cruzer8
                        Originally posted by pittpete
                        Farrior is no longer a three down LB. He simply cannot be allowed to play on third (or fourth) downs. He cost us games last year.
                        Id have to agree also.
                        Two that come to mind are the Bengal game on 4th down with thier FB and Ray Rice against the Ravens.
                        What Rice did to Farrior he does to a lot of LBers. He had 78 catches for 702 yards last year.
                        Maybe, but let's take a little closer look at that particular situation. The Ratbirds were down by three points with about three and a half minutes left, had a couple of timeouts left, and were facing a 4th down and 5 on their side of the 50 yard line. Harbaugh sent on the punting unit, which given the situation is what an NFL team would do about 99% of the time. That is especially true given the Raven's confidence in their defense. All of a sudden Harbaugh calls a timeout, and then sends his offense back out to go for it on 4th down. If they go for it and don't get it, the Ravens have basically lost the game. The only thing they can hope for is to get the ball back deep in their own territory with no timeouts and less than 2 minutes to go. There is one and only one possible conclusion that can be drawn--Harbaugh had a play that, from watching the film, he KNEW would work, and that play was to throw to Rice because Farrior could no longer cover backs.
                        Flacco was checking down to Rice all season long. 78 catches for 702 yards. Yes it sucks that we got burned by it but so did a lot of other teams.

                        Comment

                        • skyhawk
                          Hall of Famer
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 3732

                          #13
                          Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                          Farrior gets alot of unfair criticism IMO.

                          Comment

                          • ter1230_4
                            Backup
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 199

                            #14
                            Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                            Originally posted by skyhawk
                            Farrior gets alot of unfair criticism IMO.
                            Originally posted by skyhawk
                            Farrior gets alot of unfair criticism IMO.
                            Yeah, right, Potsie will be effective well into his 40's.

                            Comment

                            • Shawn
                              Legend
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 15131

                              #15
                              Re: Steelers linebacker Farrior: better, not older

                              They didn't bring Foote in to sit. If Farrior isn't done as a starter...it's real real close. I seen a guy who was more than a step slower last season. Maybe Shaw can get him ready for one more season as a starter but I suspect he will not end the season as a Steeler starting LBr.
                              Trolls are people too.

                              Comment

                              Working...