Rodgers was garbage people. You just don't know football..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain Lemming
    Legend
    • Jun 2008
    • 16041

    Rodgers was garbage people. You just don't know football..

    ...like the geniuses at pff.

    Rodgers had a a 54.5 pff rating. The exact same rating as BRODERICK JONES. TJ had the best game of anyone on the team per his grade. In fact ALL our top grades were ON DEFENSE. We gave up plus 30, scored even more to win and OUR TOP PFF SCORES WERE DEFENDERS

    Sure your lying eyes say Rodgers had a great game. But YOU don't track every play like the geniuses at pff.

    [url]https://steelersdepot.com/2025/09/t-j-watt-pffs-highest-graded-steeler-in-week-1/[/url]
    Last edited by Captain Lemming; 09-08-2025, 09:58 PM.
    sigpic



    In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

    TCFCLTC-
    The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher
  • Captain Lemming
    Legend
    • Jun 2008
    • 16041

    #2
    We should have just kept Russ.
    Russell Wilson had the EXACT SAME pff rating as Rodgers. 54.5. His stat line:

    17 of 37 (45.9 percent) for 168 yards and zero touchdowns. His TEAM scored 6 points.

    The uneducated masses think Rodger performance ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED the pathetic play of Wilson. BUT NOT PFF!!!

    ONLY THEY see the truth beneath "counting stats" that simpletons use.
    sigpic



    In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

    TCFCLTC-
    The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

    Comment

    • hawaiiansteel
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 35649

      #3
      Originally posted by Captain Lemming
      ...like the geniuses at pff.

      Rodgers had a a 54.5 pff rating. The exact same rating as BRODERICK JONES. TJ had the best game of anyone on the team per his grade. In fact ALL our top grades were ON DEFENSE. We gave up plus 30, scored even more to win and OUR TOP PFF SCORES WERE DEFENDERS

      Sure your lying eyes say Rodgers had a great game. But YOU don't track every play like the geniuses at pff.
      That's because Tomlin schemed all 4 players so wide open that anyone could have made those TD throws.

      Comment

      • NorthCoast
        Legend
        • Sep 2008
        • 26636

        #4
        That's because PFF rates every play, not just the highlights.

        26th ranked QB on the weekend.... give me that every Sunday.

        Following the matchup, CBS Sports, which broadcast the game, announced historic news about Rodgers’ debut performance.

        Over the last 60 NFL seasons, Rodgers is the only quarterback to record 240-plus passing yards, four or more passing touchdowns, and zero interceptions in his team debut.
        Last edited by NorthCoast; 09-09-2025, 05:04 AM.

        Comment

        • Captain Lemming
          Legend
          • Jun 2008
          • 16041

          #5
          Originally posted by hawaiiansteel

          That's because Tomlin schemed all 4 players so wide open that anyone could have made those TD throws.
          No, no my friend. Tomlin only overrides his OC when the plays DONT work. You should know the rules by now.

          After being criticized for the choice, if this continues, it means Tomlin did not actually choose Smith.
          sigpic



          In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

          TCFCLTC-
          The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

          Comment

          • feltdizz
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 27531

            #6
            Man.. no idea why anyone defends PFF unless they work for them.

            I’m sure there is some use for it but no one should ever use it to justify a good or bad game from a player.

            I honestly think the best use for it is simply to hive folks ammo for games they didn’t watch.. lol.

            Steelers 27
            Rats 16

            Comment

            • Captain Lemming
              Legend
              • Jun 2008
              • 16041

              #7
              Originally posted by feltdizz
              Man.. no idea why anyone defends PFF unless they work for them.

              I’m sure there is some use for it but no one should ever use it to justify a good or bad game from a player.

              I honestly think the best use for it is simply to hive folks ammo for games they didn’t watch.. lol.
              • LB T.J. Watt — 82.4
              • CB Jalen Ramsey — 79.4
              • DL Daniel Ekuale — 72.9
              • S DeShon Elliott — 72.3
              • LB Patrick Queen — 69.9
              • DL Cameron Heyward — 68.4
              • CB Brandin Echols — 67.6
              • LB Malik Harrison — 66.5
              • S Chuck Clark — 63.2
              • S Juan Thornhill — 61.6
              All of these defenders on a defense that gave up 32 were better than 4 touchdown Rodgers because he “almost” threw a pick or two.

              Rodgers and 6 point zero TD 47 percent Russ had similar performances.
              sigpic



              In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

              TCFCLTC-
              The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

              Comment

              • pfelix73
                Hall of Famer
                • Aug 2008
                • 3458

                #8
                PFF sucks, just like the owner.
                6- Time Super Bowl Champions......
                IX X XIII XIV XL XLIII

                2012 MNF Executive Champion

                sigpic



                Comment

                • The Standard
                  Backup
                  • Mar 2025
                  • 246

                  #9
                  PFT and PFF should just merge.

                  Comment

                  • Flasteel
                    Hall of Famer
                    • May 2008
                    • 4004

                    #10
                    Originally posted by feltdizz
                    Man.. no idea why anyone defends PFF unless they work for them.

                    I’m sure there is some use for it but no one should ever use it to justify a good or bad game from a player.

                    I honestly think the best use for it is simply to hive folks ammo for games they didn’t watch.. lol.
                    To me, the use is just adding color to the stats that are actually indicative of play...the ones we all grew up with and know. Like sacks, TFLs, yards, or QB ratings. These kooky metrics they came up with should in no way mitigate traditional stats. It robbed TJ Watt of a DPOY and continually attempts to tell our eyeballs that we don't know what the fu@k we are talking about.
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    Working...