Peyton said this is a "new analytics thing", after which they all roundly criticized the Giants for, but if this is the correct interpretation I think it makes sense:
Scenario: Down by 14 in 2nd half, early enough to have multiple subsequent drives. Score TD, go for 2.
Risks: Need TD + 2 to tie
Rewards: Still only down one score if it fails, if it succeeds you have for two FG drives to tie, or TD/PAT to win.
I'm I seeing this the right way?
Scenario: Down by 14 in 2nd half, early enough to have multiple subsequent drives. Score TD, go for 2.
Risks: Need TD + 2 to tie
Rewards: Still only down one score if it fails, if it succeeds you have for two FG drives to tie, or TD/PAT to win.
I'm I seeing this the right way?
Comment