Re: Rams release Marc Bulger
[quote=frankthetank1]
oh i know it was about batch. my point is batch is just as good or better than some of the washed up retreds that are available to play second or third string qb.
i would say leftwich is a lot better than bulger. at least charlie use to be a good qb in the nfl. i cant say that about bulger[/quote:1fgd9qq8]
What? Bulger is a two-time Pro Bowler. Batch? Not so much.
Bulger has a 62.1 completion percentage with 22,814 passing yards, 122 TD's, 93 INT's, and career passer rating of 84.4. In Bulger's most statistically productive season, he threw for 4,301 yards, 24 TD's, and 8 INT's.
Batch has a 56.1 completion percentage with 10,050 passing yards, 57 TD's, 44 INT's, and career passer rating of 77.9. In Batch's most statistically productive season, he threw for 2,489 yards, 13 TD's, and 15 INT's.
It's not even remotely close here.
[quote=frankthetank1]
Originally posted by Dee Dub
i would say leftwich is a lot better than bulger. at least charlie use to be a good qb in the nfl. i cant say that about bulger[/quote:1fgd9qq8]
What? Bulger is a two-time Pro Bowler. Batch? Not so much.
Bulger has a 62.1 completion percentage with 22,814 passing yards, 122 TD's, 93 INT's, and career passer rating of 84.4. In Bulger's most statistically productive season, he threw for 4,301 yards, 24 TD's, and 8 INT's.
Batch has a 56.1 completion percentage with 10,050 passing yards, 57 TD's, 44 INT's, and career passer rating of 77.9. In Batch's most statistically productive season, he threw for 2,489 yards, 13 TD's, and 15 INT's.
It's not even remotely close here.
Comment