Steelers released C Mason Cole
Collapse
X
-
-
Wonder if there was an incentive to make this move now vs waiting. I think we have so many needs that this doesn?t really tip our hand.Steelers 27
Rats 16Comment
-
I'd still love to play poker with these guys.Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!Comment
-
Comment
-
This isn't tipping anything. No team was thinking before this that the Steelers don't need a center. The need is just as glaring with nobody there as it was with Mason Cole there.Comment
-
Comment
-
We're going to need a rookie to step in an start on day one. That means we have to draft one early (I think it should be at 20 if we don't have a backup plan). It means that we can't take the luxury of the player we love (e.g. a TE) and get left with a guy we think might be able to convert to C.Comment
-
Hold onto Mason for what? To trick folks into thinking C wasn’t a need? Seems silly to me. Would not be surprised if we don’t even go Center round 1. That might be a reach anyway.
Hopefully we get back to BPA and don’t draft for need.Steelers 27
Rats 16Comment
-
Given how Khan did in his first draft and everyone being wrong about Willis I think some of you would go home naked if you played poker with the FO.
Hold onto Mason for what? To trick folks into thinking C wasn’t a need? Seems silly to me. Would not be surprised if we don’t even go Center round 1. That might be a reach anyway.
Hopefully we get back to BPA and don’t draft for need.
It's why I think we'll do the Colbert type thing here and sign someone who can play C on day 1 if we need them to.
Then we don't get forced into the situation of choosing between reaching or forcing a guy who's clearly not ready to start into the lineup on day 1. We did that last time we were looking for a C in the draft.Comment
-
This.
It's why I think we'll do the Colbert type thing here and sign someone who can play C on day 1 if we need them to.
Then we don't get forced into the situation of choosing between reaching or forcing a guy who's clearly not ready to start into the lineup on day 1. We did that last time we were looking for a C in the draft.Steelers 27
Rats 16Comment
-
I don't think going into the drafto without a playable center is a good idea.
You never know how the draft breaks. And you don't want to get screwed out of the top 3 guys, or feel like you're forced to try to overpay to trade up if the first 2 go before our 2nd pick.
The idea that you shouldn't bring in mid-level UFAs is really flawed I think. Because it forces you to draft hard for need. Which is a very poor draft strategy IMO (and I think the data supports that). If we do that, I think we have to expect that we draft a C in the first. Because the need would be so acute that we couldn't really risk waiting until the 2nd.
The hard part about being a GM (IMO) is that you need to solve for all the positions simultaneously to build a roster that is good and fits under the cap. And there's lots of uncertainty because you don't know who falls to you in the draft or how they turn out, and UFAs tend to be overpriced and often fail in different systems.sigpic
In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:
TCFCLTC-
The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than CowherComment
-
sigpic
In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:
TCFCLTC-
The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than CowherComment
-
I can't think of any football teams that play without a center.Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!Comment
-
Spot on and I'd still love to play poker with these guys. They tip their hand at every turn.Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!Comment
-
Comment
Comment