James Pierre coming back

[whatever]

why would I say he was toast when I didn’t believe he was toast?

That doesn’t make much sense.

It was during his time in KC when it was obvious to me he wasn’t ever returning to form.

Yup, just like I said.
He wasn’t worth it.
You said he was. And you continue d to say for 2 more years.
You blamed everyone but him.
Now you want to act like we’re correct.
Well, you were correct. It just took you 2 years after most of us.

[Northern_Blitz]

Dude, in one game I saw him on the field during the first defensive snap of the game with my own eyes. I call that a starter. No one has the film to say it didn't happen. Do you have the team we are playing against? It was an early game. Again the burden is on you to disprove what I said. I do not care what some website says who stated game X, my point is he was on the field when we opened the game. It crystal clear that you aren't going to do the work here and are saying things I didn't exactly say.

I consider the issue which you 1 ) can't seem to let go 2 ) won't prove and 3) Are twisting around what I said to be closed. Pierre has been re-signed.

I believe PRF would have listed him with 1 start if this was true.

My understanding is that they call that a starter as well.

[Northern_Blitz]

that isn't how it works. If you claim you saw something you should easily be able to site the game. There are 17 of them. It's not that hard.

One thing I learned is when someone online claims something and then demands someone else do the research its' simply because that proof doesn't exist.

The burden is on you.. but since you aren't confident you choose to deflect instead of simply admitting you made a mistake.

Particularly because he's asking YOU what game HE saw him starting in.

[feltdizz]

Yup, just like I said.
He wasn’t worth it.
You said he was. And you continue d to say for 2 more years.
You blamed everyone but him.
Now you want to act like we’re correct.
Well, you were correct. It just took you 2 years after most of us.

I wasn’t correct.

No idea why its hard for you to digest that I admitted it.

Its like its thrown you into a tail spin

”now you want to act like we are correct”

lmao.. no, its not an act. I admitted it and you missed it.

[feltdizz]

Particularly because he's asking YOU what game HE saw him starting in.

its like SM asking me to “help him prove he was Black” by finding his private messages to me.

huh?

[Captain Lemming]

I never wrote that he is the sure starter at CB. Please show me where I said that,

http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums/showthread.php/51415-Steelers-Testing-Change-at-Cornerback?p=842212&highlight=Pierre#post842212

Almost word for word my brother.

[feltdizz]

http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums...rre#post842212

Almost word for word my brother.

lmao.. and he added a “Where was a wrong” as the cherry on top.

where? all over the thread Joel.. you were wrong all up and down the thread”

[Northern_Blitz]

http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums...rre#post842212

Almost word for word my brother.

Hey, I'm in that post:

So they are admitting [Sutton]'s a best fit a nickel. Pierre to projected th start, , Sutton to compete at nickel back.

To which I said

I think they would leave [Sutton] on the outside if they could.

They clearly wanted to do that.

But it doesn't seem like we have any other good options at slot CB.

Sutton will still run ahead of your boy Pierre when we only have 2 CBs on the field.

It's OK to admit that you're wrong...especially when it's plainly obvious to everyone else.

To which Joel replied

Pierre is going to be the starter @ outside corner. He the young player with untaped upside is doing better in camp. Where was I wrong?

Trending my way..

The search function is not user friendly on this site. But learning how to use it can really end certain arguments (if people in those arguments are willing to admit they are wrong when provided proof).

[Captain Lemming]

Hey, I'm in that post:


To which I said


To which Joel replied



The search function is not user friendly on this site. But learning how to use it can really end certain arguments (if people in those arguments are willing to admit they are wrong when provided proof).

You closed with the problem my friend.

[feltdizz]

You closed with the problem my friend.

Joel, whatever and SM when provided with evidence that proves them wrong.

[Joel Buchsbaum]

Hey, I'm in that post:


To which I said


To which Joel replied



The search function is not user friendly on this site. But learning how to use it can really end certain arguments (if people in those arguments are willing to admit they are wrong when provided proof).

Yeah I replied in August going into his second season. Check the dates. Obviously he was not named the starter.

[feltdizz]

Yeah I replied in August going into his second season. Check the dates. Obviously he was not named the starter.

We know this.

Your prediction was wrong. It happens.

[Joel Buchsbaum]

We know this.

Your prediction was wrong. It happens.

Yes it does, But tell me who was our outside corners in the nickel and dime? You known the formations we play the most. I wait for you to reply.

[feltdizz]

Yes it does, But tell me who was our outside corners in the nickel and dime? You known the formations we play the most. I wait for you to reply.

keep waiting. I’m not here to make you feel better about being wrong by answering a totally different question.

[Northern_Blitz]

Yes it does, But tell me who was our outside corners in the nickel and dime? You known the formations we play the most. I wait for you to reply.

You know that's what I said in the post, right? That he'd play outside when we had 3 or 4 CBs but door in base?

He probably did some of that. He played 36% of snaps in 21 (up from 3% on 20). My guess is that nickle + dime was 60 or more percent of snaps. So I don't think he was consistently in both.