Do we really need to spend a high draft pick on receiver?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joel Buchsbaum
    Legend
    • Jan 2021
    • 7229

    Do we really need to spend a high draft pick on receiver?

    Going under the assumption that Johnson is not going to be a coaching headache, I think fans will be pleasantly surprised by Austin's play. He was a tough cover in camp. Pickens, 'Muth, Johnson, and Warren/Harris will get 85% of the targets next year. They are the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, at 4th most targeted players. IMO Austin will prove to be a tough cover and has the speed to break one and get favorable match ups. Think about it before you mock draft a receiver early.
    Last edited by Joel Buchsbaum; 01-19-2023, 06:52 AM.
    Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in seven years and counting. The earliest will be eight years. I guess that in Art Rooney's II, opinion is worth a 3 year extension.

    Our 2024 draft looks to be grade A. Our 2023 draft is an A. The roster is talented, but Mike Tomlin is still the head coach.

    *** Mike Tomlin is the best coach since the AFL- NFL merger that has not won a playoff game in 8 seasons or more. It's either him or Lewis. ***
  • Oviedo
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 23675

    #2
    If healthy, I think Austin will be a huge plus to the offense. I have been a fan since day 1 because i watched him throughout college...but if healthy.

    If Jordan Addison is sitting at #17, I would consider him very hard. Just look at the impact reuniting Burrow and Chase had. Johnson may not be a coaching headache, but he is still dynamic AND UNRELIABLE! We do need to improve the WR grouping. It isn't deep and once you get to the third guy, it is very unproven and very much journeyman-like
    "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

    Comment

    • Ghost
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 6181

      #3
      NO! Absolutely not. It would be hugely disappointing to take a WR in the first 3 rounds. O line, CB, D line, and LB are all bigger needs than WR.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • Joel Buchsbaum
        Legend
        • Jan 2021
        • 7229

        #4
        Originally posted by Ghost
        NO! Absolutely not. It would be hugely disappointing to take a WR in the first 3 rounds. O line, CB, D line, and LB are all bigger needs than WR.
        +1 Okay that makes three posters who feel this way.
        Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in seven years and counting. The earliest will be eight years. I guess that in Art Rooney's II, opinion is worth a 3 year extension.

        Our 2024 draft looks to be grade A. Our 2023 draft is an A. The roster is talented, but Mike Tomlin is still the head coach.

        *** Mike Tomlin is the best coach since the AFL- NFL merger that has not won a playoff game in 8 seasons or more. It's either him or Lewis. ***

        Comment

        • Iron City Inc.
          Hall of Famer
          • Jun 2013
          • 3130

          #5
          Got to agree with our first 3 picks I don't see it.
          Sims I thought showed he's serviceable. Too Anthony Miller they believe he's also serviceable as his signing shows. So some depth there along with Boykin.
          Last edited by Iron City Inc.; 01-19-2023, 07:53 PM.

          Comment

          • Chucktownsteeler
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 6636

            #6
            If Jordan Addison or Jaxon Smith-Njigba is there at #17 you have to strongly consider it. Would Burrow be Burrow without Ja'marr Chase?

            I think we battle the Bengals for the foreseeable future for the AFC North. Their tandem is Chase-Higgins. Does anyone in here seriously think DJ and Pickens are even close to them? I like Pickens but have no faith in "wrong-way Diontae".

            As far as Austin goes I will keep an open mind bit I've seen these "mighty-mites" crash and burn before, does Rainey or Archer ring a bell?
            Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!

            Comment

            • Joel Buchsbaum
              Legend
              • Jan 2021
              • 7229

              #7
              Originally posted by Chucktownsteeler
              If Jordan Addison or Jaxon Smith-Njigba is there at #17 you have to strongly consider it. Would Burrow be Burrow without Ja'marr Chase?

              I think we battle the Bengals for the foreseeable future for the AFC North. Their tandem is Chase-Higgins. Does anyone in here seriously think DJ and Pickens are even close to them? I like Pickens but have no faith in "wrong-way Diontae".

              As far as Austin goes I will keep an open mind bit I've seen these "mighty-mites" crash and burn before, does Rainey or Archer ring a bell?
              How many catches did Rainy or Archer have in college? Not nearly as much and they were not running the type of routes or catching difficult passes like Austin did, not did either produce the type of reciveing yards that Austin did. I was 100% against the Archer pick by the way and Rainey was had off the field problems.

              But WR in round one in 2023, no way! I see Pickens as a Chase type of player, but not Pickett as a Burrow type of player.

              Austin will fit nicely in the slot / as a 4th options for us. He was impressive in camp before getting hurt.
              Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in seven years and counting. The earliest will be eight years. I guess that in Art Rooney's II, opinion is worth a 3 year extension.

              Our 2024 draft looks to be grade A. Our 2023 draft is an A. The roster is talented, but Mike Tomlin is still the head coach.

              *** Mike Tomlin is the best coach since the AFL- NFL merger that has not won a playoff game in 8 seasons or more. It's either him or Lewis. ***

              Comment

              • Northern_Blitz
                Legend
                • Dec 2008
                • 23233

                #8
                Originally posted by Ghost
                NO! Absolutely not. It would be hugely disappointing to take a WR in the first 3 rounds. O line, CB, D line, and LB are all bigger needs than WR.
                Honestly...I'd be happy if we just wait until round 3.

                But I think we'll use one of the 2nds on a WR. I hope we don't use the 1st.

                Comment

                • Terrapin
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 2037

                  #9
                  Since Tomlin is still HC and Canada OC, they'd be crazy to waste any picks on a WR. Why would they? So the WR can get 2 targets a game like Pickens?

                  Comment

                  • feltdizz
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 26823

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Iron City Inc.
                    Got to agree with our first 3 picks I don't see it.
                    Sims I thought showed he's serviceable. Too Anthony Miller they believe he's also serviceable as his signing shows. So some depth there along with Boykin,
                    its 2023. We don’t need serviceable. We need another playmaker.

                    I think if not rd 1 then definitely rd 2.
                    Steelers 27
                    Rats 16

                    Comment

                    • Terrapin
                      Pro Bowler
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 2037

                      #11
                      Originally posted by feltdizz
                      its 2023. We don’t need serviceable. We need another playmaker.

                      I think if not rd 1 then definitely rd 2.
                      A playmaker for what? To stand there? Occasionally run go routes? They already admitted they don't know how to use Austin. Seriously, in the history of the league, have you ever head coaches say they don't know how to use a 4th rd draft pick? Beyond embarrassing

                      Comment

                      • Buzz
                        Legend
                        • Dec 2017
                        • 8124

                        #12
                        No WR in 1st 3 rounds

                        UNLESS

                        we could trade DJ for a pick in rounds 1-3

                        Hello, Chicago?

                        Comment

                        • Northern_Blitz
                          Legend
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 23233

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Chucktownsteeler
                          If Jordan Addison or Jaxon Smith-Njigba is there at #17 you have to strongly consider it. Would Burrow be Burrow without Ja'marr Chase?

                          I think we battle the Bengals for the foreseeable future for the AFC North. Their tandem is Chase-Higgins. Does anyone in here seriously think DJ and Pickens are even close to them? I like Pickens but have no faith in "wrong-way Diontae".

                          As far as Austin goes I will keep an open mind bit I've seen these "mighty-mites" crash and burn before, does Rainey or Archer ring a bell?
                          How fast is Addison? I don't watch NCAA, but heard recently that he's not expected to time all that well.

                          If he's the WR equivalent of Najee (good all around, but won't get explosive plays in the NFL because he isn't NFL fast), then I don't think that's what we need.

                          But I understand why people from Pittsburgh and Kenny fans want him. Sounds like they were a great connection in college.

                          Comment

                          • papillon
                            Legend
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 11320

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ghost
                            NO! Absolutely not. It would be hugely disappointing to take a WR in the first 3 rounds. O line, CB, D line, and LB are all bigger needs than WR.
                            Amen!

                            Pappy
                            sigpic

                            The 2024 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                            1.20 - Troy Fautanu, T, Washington
                            2.51 - Zach Frazier, C, West Virginia
                            3.84 - Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan
                            3.98 - Payton Wilson, LB, UNC
                            4.119 - Mason McCprmick, OG, S. Dakota St
                            7.178 - Logan Lee, DT, Iowa
                            7.195 -

                            "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                            Comment

                            • NJ-STEELER
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 12563

                              #15
                              I have little doubt they’ll take one on day 1 or 2.

                              my preference - a 3rd rounder.
                              but I have a feeling they use a 2nd round pick on one, like they regularly seem to do.

                              they drafted chase for a reason, and he’s no longer here. They’ll draft his replacement this year.

                              Comment

                              Working...