Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: Lamar Jackson has been waived

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Legend

    User Info Menu


  2. #2
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    maybe this is the Lamar Jackson that Steel Maniac predicted would be a total flop and bust in the NFL?

    after all, his predictions are time-based and can be changed at anytime.
    Steel Maniac's Time-Based Prediction: Lamar Jackson will be a bust and total flop in the NFL.

    What Actually Happened: Lamar Jackson became the youngest two-time NFL MVP winner ever.

    Gloat gloat gloat


    Boom........Knuckle up. Punk.

    My IT guy...
    Hahahahahahaha

  3. #3
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by hawaiiansteel View Post
    maybe this is the Lamar Jackson that Steel Maniac predicted would be a total flop and bust in the NFL?

    after all, his predictions are time-based and can be changed at anytime.
    Similar to your loudermilk being our olb savior?
    How is it possible to have the best owner, best front office, best gm, best HC, good/great drafts every year and good FA acquisitions every year, but only have 3 playoff wins in 14 years?

  4. #4
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by whatever View Post
    Similar to your loudermilk being our olb savior?
    Similar to your "Everybody loved the DJ pick?"
    Steel Maniac's Time-Based Prediction: Lamar Jackson will be a bust and total flop in the NFL.

    What Actually Happened: Lamar Jackson became the youngest two-time NFL MVP winner ever.

    Gloat gloat gloat


    Boom........Knuckle up. Punk.

    My IT guy...
    Hahahahahahaha

  5. #5
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.

  6. #6
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by whisper View Post
    It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.
    Lol, okay nevermind.

  7. #7
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.wizard View Post
    Lol, okay nevermind.
    Speak, if you got something to say, don't be scare-red.

  8. #8
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by whisper View Post
    It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.
    oh.. SM lost that debate long ago.

    The original debate is his play would be so bad he would set them back 5 years.

    When that didn’t happen he changed it to “Lamar is going to be so good he is going to get a hige contract that set’s them back 5 years”

    and now its probably “Lamar wants so much guaranteed money he is going to set the Ravens back 5 years”

    We still have no idea when he will start setting them back 5 years. Did that start already? What year are we in?
    I lost a bet about Najee gaining 1300 yards.

    "Our head coach has failed to win a playoff game for seven years in a row. His game day strategy, culture of divas, in game decisions, clock management, player evaluation, hires, and affinity with sub par starters at RB, P, and OL are holding the Steelers back. That standard remains the standard"



  9. #9
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by feltdizz View Post
    oh.. SM lost that debate long ago.

    The original debate is his play would be so bad he would set them back 5 years.

    When that didn’t happen he changed it to “Lamar is going to be so good he is going to get a hige contract that set’s them back 5 years”

    and now its probably “Lamar wants so much guaranteed money he is going to set the Ravens back 5 years”

    We still have no idea when he will start setting them back 5 years. Did that start already? What year are we in?
    Well, to be fair, the Ravens have the same goal as us: to win a SB. So, in a sense LJ has prevented them from that.

  10. #10
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    lol

    when I saw the thread title I thought it was April Fool's a week early

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •