Lamar Jackson has been waived

[NJ-STEELER]

https://www.denverbroncos.com/news/broncos-waive-cb-lamar-jackson-release-olb-wyatt-ray

[hawaiiansteel]

maybe this is the Lamar Jackson that Steel Maniac predicted would be a total flop and bust in the NFL?

after all, his predictions are time-based and can be changed at anytime.

[Buzz]

lol

when I saw the thread title I thought it was April Fool's a week early

[NJ-STEELER]

................

[whatever]

maybe this is the Lamar Jackson that Steel Maniac predicted would be a total flop and bust in the NFL?

after all, his predictions are time-based and can be changed at anytime.

Similar to your loudermilk being our olb savior?

[hawaiiansteel]

Similar to your loudermilk being our olb savior?

Similar to your "Everybody loved the DJ pick?"

[whisper]

It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.

[Mr.wizard]

You guys gave it away to early, I was waiting for Joel and Maniac to chime in.

[Mr.wizard]

It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.

Lol, okay nevermind.

[whisper]

Lol, okay nevermind.

Speak, if you got something to say, don't be scare-red.

[feltdizz]

It does beg to question: who is now winning the LJ debate? This had to move it a click over to his critiques, no? I have no skin in that game: I wasn't hard core either way on it. I thought he was better than pure rubbish but doubted his ability to win a ring.

oh.. SM lost that debate long ago.

The original debate is his play would be so bad he would set them back 5 years.

When that didn’t happen he changed it to “Lamar is going to be so good he is going to get a hige contract that set’s them back 5 years”

and now its probably “Lamar wants so much guaranteed money he is going to set the Ravens back 5 years”

We still have no idea when he will start setting them back 5 years. Did that start already? What year are we in?

[feltdizz]

You guys gave it away to early, I was waiting for Joel and Maniac to chime in.

you know SM ran in here like..

its happenning, its happ.. wait, dammit!!!!

[whisper]

oh.. SM lost that debate long ago.

The original debate is his play would be so bad he would set them back 5 years.

When that didn’t happen he changed it to “Lamar is going to be so good he is going to get a hige contract that set’s them back 5 years”

and now its probably “Lamar wants so much guaranteed money he is going to set the Ravens back 5 years”

We still have no idea when he will start setting them back 5 years. Did that start already? What year are we in?

Well, to be fair, the Ravens have the same goal as us: to win a SB. So, in a sense LJ has prevented them from that.

[feltdizz]

Well, to be fair, the Ravens have the same goal as us: to win a SB. So, in a sense LJ has prevented them from that.

umm, okay.. sure. lol

[hawaiiansteel]

umm, okay.. sure. lol

gotta love how when the Ravens lose it's all their QB's fault.

but when the Steelers lose, it's all our head coach's fault.