I started thinking about the recent comments Tomlin and Kahn made regarding the draft and the "Steelers system" they use in their approach. So if, in fact, they have a system how much influence does the GM, HC, or staff have when drafting players? And which regime did better at it?
As a simple measure I looked at PFR's Approximate Value for the careers of the top players (AV >= 50).
Question; How many picks hit this threshold under Cowher and Tomlin and what was the average AV over the history of their drafts?
At first glance it looks like the Cowher regime did better than the Tomlin regime on average. He drafted twice as many players that have produced at a high level and his average AV is higher. But, Cowher's average AV is skewed by one pick (Roethlisberger). Remove his career AV and Cowher's average drops to 69.2. Very close to Tomlin's.
Keep in mind that some of Tomlin's draft picks are still accumulating AV and his average might get boosted further.
So this has me thinking maybe it's the 'Steelers system' rather than the people running it that are the source of the success in drafting talent.
As a simple measure I looked at PFR's Approximate Value for the careers of the top players (AV >= 50).
Question; How many picks hit this threshold under Cowher and Tomlin and what was the average AV over the history of their drafts?
| # of Picks w/AV >=50 | Avg AV across drafts | Avg Pick # across drafts | |
| Tomlin | 10 | 70.7 | 134.8 |
| Cowher | 22 | 72.0 | 134.1 |
Keep in mind that some of Tomlin's draft picks are still accumulating AV and his average might get boosted further.
So this has me thinking maybe it's the 'Steelers system' rather than the people running it that are the source of the success in drafting talent.

Comment