I think they will offer him market or above, with the understanding that market for a +31 DL is NOT the same as a 28 yr old. Although I also think Cam's agent will argue that Cam is a better player than 80% of the guys younger than him, which is valid. We'll see how this story unfolds.
This Heyward situation reminds me of the Faneca situation of years ago. Faneca, at the time, was still considered a top 2 guard in the game, along with Hutchinson of Seattle. The Steelers (I believe) had Faneca earmarked at a number. IIRC the area was around $6M per. Then, that off-season, both the Bills and Browns signed lesser guards to around that number, driving Faneca's perceived market value up a couple of mil. The Steelers essentially decided that the collective braintrusts of Buffalo and Cleveland do not control how the Steelers spend their cap money, and they let Faneca walk.
Not saying in any way that Bosa is a lesser talent, but if the Steelers had Heyward pegged at one number, and now the Chargers have upset the market and forced that number up, the team will not allow the Chargers to be their capologist. If that means the eventual price can't be negotiated and Cam walks, unfortunate, but that's the way it goes. Shake hands and part ways.
Good analogy. And to some extent Heyward needs to decide how much he values finishing his career in Pittsburgh vs chasing max dollars. And he can look no further than how things worked out for Faneca, or even J Harrison.
Game is different now though. Maybe less loyalty from both sides, so chasing the money may be viewed less harshly. Still be a shame to lose a guy that might have 3 or 4 more good years left.
It would be a big blow to the team, but you have to operate with some form of boundaries. I've seen where the Steelers have paid too much to keep their own players here and it didn't work out. (I.e. Kirkland, Woodley, Gildon, Kordell, etc.) But players only have so much time to make their life earnings. If Pgh is coming in at $3 mill a year less, or $10 mill overall less in guaranteed $, than other teams will pay, that's a lot of coin to just let float away.
In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:
TCFCLTC-
The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher
There is value to playing for the Steelers, especially when you have roots there. I was surprised when I heard Plex, of all people, talk about when you leave the Steelers, you realize how special it is, with everyone being treated like family. But, at what price? A mill a year? Stay. 5 mill? Probably not.
Goes back to a discussion on a thread a few months ago. His next contract, on top of everything he has earned to date, will put him close to the $100M career earnings range. For most people, that would be enough to set both him and his family's future.
So, considering your future is taken care of, what value do you put on stability vs. the unknown? He knows that he is happy in Pittsburgh (I assume, if not then this idea is meaningless). If he plans on continuing playing for two more years, would he rather ensure that he is happy where he plays, or do you risk spending the remainder of your career in misery? He will retire an extremely wealthy man either way. This is not a Steeler fan question, more of a player philosophy question.
Bookmarks