Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Steelers Are NFLís Worst Short Yardage Team (And Itís Not Close)

  1. #1
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Steelers Are NFLís Worst Short Yardage Team (And Itís Not Close)

    The Steelers Are The NFL’s Worst Short Yardage Team (And It’s Not Close)

    By Alex Kozora
    Posted on November 18, 2019

    I’ll reiterate the title because it’s worth repeating. The Pittsburgh Steelers are the league’s worst short yardage team. That’s not opinion. That’s fact. Numbers based. They don’t lie. And when it comes to this offense, like most aspects of it, things ain’t pretty.

    On the season, the Steelers have had 16 plays of 3rd/4th and 1. You would assume most teams are successful there. You’d be right. The Baltimore Ravens, for example, have converted 90% of the time (prior to this weekend) and the league average is 66.7%, two-thirds of the chances. Even teams who rank objectively poor, like the Cleveland Browns (who are 30th) are still at 47%.

    The Steelers? Just 25%. Four first downs on 16 attempts. They’re finding themselves in the easiest situations to convert yet failing time and time again.

    There’s still six games remaining, numbers can change, and we are dealing with admittedly small sample sizes. But if Pittsburgh stays on this pace, it’ll be a historically ugly figure.

    Since Mike Tomlin took over as head coach in 2007, here are the NFL offenses who finished a year with a sub-50% conversion rate on 3rd and 4th and 1.

    Team (Year) Conversion Rate %
    Packers (2007) 39.3%
    Jets (2017) 40%
    Seahawks (2010) 44.1%
    Falcons (2012) 44.8%
    49ers (2012) 45.5%
    Giants (2017) 46.2%
    Lions (2017) 48%
    Bears (2010) 48.1%
    Rams (2013) 48.1%
    Titans (2015) 48.1%
    Lions (2010) 48.6%
    Lions (2009) 48.4%

    So Pittsburgh is on pace for a record low number and even if things get a bit better, they’ll still be the worst in the last decade. To avoid being the worst team in this area of Tomlin’s tenure, they’d need to convert on their next four attempts, climbing them up to 40%, just ahead of the ’07 Packers.

    And don’t think the numbers are skewed since we’re only talking distances of just one yard. Expand the numbers out to 3rd/4th and short, two or three yards, and the Steelers aren’t any better. 31st in those conversions, 31.6%, six pickups on 19 attempts.

    Here’s maybe the best way I can put things. This is the Steelers conversion rate on 3rd and 1-3 versus 3rd and 7+.

    3rd and 1-3: 28.6%
    3rd and 7+: 27%

    Pittsburgh is basically as successful on 3rd and long as they are on third and short. Horrendous and frankly, probably unheard of.

    Why has this area been such an issue? Lack of a run game and lack of a scheme. Outside of Randy Fichtner’s shovel pass, which has mixed results, there aren’t many “go to” plays in these situations. And given the fact the Steelers can’t run the ball to save their lives, they’re in the middle of one of their worst rushing seasons ever, the offense is dead in the water. Even in the game’s most manageable situations.

    https://steelersdepot.com/2019/11/th...its-not-close/
    Last edited by hawaiiansteel; 11-18-2019 at 01:22 PM.

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Bells fault.

  3. #3
    Pro Bowler

    User Info Menu

    Are there any 250/260 pound running backs available right now?

  4. #4
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Passes behind the line of scrimmage don't help the cause. And they do it at a crazy rate.
    Add in RBs that are meh, OL that is frequently meh, and no one can be surprised by this stat.

  5. #5
    Pro Bowler

    User Info Menu

    Hoped Snell would be the answer but...

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by The Man of Steel View Post
    Are there any 250/260 pound running backs available right now?
    Thatís part of the problem. Our RBís are slow to the hole and have no lateral movement.

    and whoever is on the edge blitzing ALWAYS goes untouched and makes the tackle for a loss.

    Just slow off the ball and predictable.
    Last edited by Oh wow; 11-18-2019 at 02:14 PM.

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Oh wow View Post
    Thatís part of the problem. Our RBís are slow to the hole and have no lateral movement.

    and whoever is on the edge blitzing ALWAYS goes untouched and makes the tackle for a loss.

    Just slow off the ball and predictable.
    I'm sure you think Bell would've been the cure for this.

  8. #8
    Backup

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by The Man of Steel View Post
    Are there any 250/260 pound running backs available right now?
    Well, I am slow, have poor vision and I should be up to 250-260 by Black Friday. Can I be the next Steeler back? Can I do any worse, LOL

  9. #9
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    No FB equals no short yardage..
    You can line up as many Olineman as you want but if the defense beats you to a spot your dead in the backfield.
    I wish people would/could leave politics out of a Steelers Football Forum.

  10. #10
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by pittpete View Post
    No FB equals no short yardage..
    You can line up as many Olineman as you want but if the defense beats you to a spot your dead in the backfield.
    Is it that hard to find a FB that's even mediocre?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •