As always, my argument is that tallent is more important than coaching. But coaching is still important.
The N=3 isn't big enough to know of our success hiring coaches is luck or skill. Or if we'll still have the same process without Dan.
I think taking the chance with the end of Ben's career is a bad bet (has negative expected value). If Ben retires and Mason isn't a clear franchise I'm fine looking for our next coach.
So, I'm not necessarily against getting rid of Tomlin. It's just that I think the arguments for doing so mostly suck (e.g. He was hired because of the Rooney Rule)
Bookmarks