I think the team is the Packers...
I think the team is the Packers...
Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.
Thankfully, somebody invented Google last night.
[url]http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/37856129.html[/url]
Consistent pressure on the QB and secondary play are the keys to success on defense in today's NFL. We are pretty bad at both. I don't see any changes that could yield significant improvements.
Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.
[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]
Do they have "that guy" for the 3-4? You keep saying we don't have the guys for the 4-3 and act like we have them for the 3-4 which is proving more laughable this year than the past three. Perhaps we don't have that guy because we don't draft the DE who can step in and play and instead draft a conversion project and wait 2-3 years and hope it works out. I'll guarantee if we were playing the 4-3, our picks would have been different as you well know.
"My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"
First, as I've pointed out a number of times, most rookies struggle, regardless of scheme. Go back and look at the pro bowl defense ends last year - most did nothing as rookies playing in a 4-3.
This team doesn't have the personnel for an elite defense in any system. Jason Worilds is getting paid to be a premier pass rusher and he gets no push. He also gets blown out in the run game, something that wouldn't change regardless of whether he puts his hand on the ground or not. We kept hearing from you about how the system didn't fit Ziggy Hood - guess what - he still stinks in Jacksonville, as does their entire defense.
Mike Mitchell jumped an underneath route, leading to the big pass play late against Tampa Bay. Does that change if the team plays a base 4-3?
Bookmarks