Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Archer > Reggie Bush

  1. #11
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,859
    Quote Originally Posted by sick beats View Post
    I thought I read DA was timed at 4.2?

    http://www.ohio.com/blogs/kent-state...rcher-1.287533

    Any how, I am talking more about actual football speed. Bush is fast, without any doubt. But I just have never seen him look this fast. Dri can pop dat thang. Reggie just kind of semi pops it.

    Watch the 2 min. mark. In hindsight, I think Bush is more of a 2-3rd round talent.

    This vid has one of the best jams of all time.


    Bush put together one of the single best, most electrfying seasons for a RB of all time at USC. The man was unstoppable. He was a top 5 pick as a RB or as WR. Had he put up more modest numbers like Gio Bernard did at UNC or Chris Johnson did at ECU then, sure a 2nd round guy but he didnt and was a run away heisman winner instead. (I used CJ and GB as comparisojns because i described them both as poor mans reggie bush prior to being drafted)

    Bush had 1740 rushing yards and 18 TDs with highlight after highlight after highlight and almost 9 yards per carry....that is unreal. Archer did get 9 per carry in 2012, but were talking a different animal when it comes to offense and quality of competition

  2. #12
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,756
    Quote Originally Posted by Shawn View Post
    Let me answer that for you because I was pretty sure you were talking out your a**. The only guy faster than Archer since electronic timing back in 2000 is Chris Johnson. And I believe he had a pretty good career. Archer is one fast mofo. http://www.statisticbrain.com/fastes...n-nfl-history/
    Jeff Demps was faster too. I don't think he ran the 40 at the combine.
    http://jeromiandbrittany.blogspot.com/

    Earn Some Bitcoins


    PBMining

    http://www.qoinpro.com/91f8fc96f7dfd461f6483ab3950deccc

    I am paying for my honeymoon using bitcoins.
    1PQsjF9rQqEWF8RfPzczyqCW6ULu1nZ3iu

  3. #13
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,872
    Quote Originally Posted by K Train View Post
    Bush put together one of the single best, most electrfying seasons for a RB of all time at USC. The man was unstoppable. He was a top 5 pick as a RB or as WR. Had he put up more modest numbers like Gio Bernard did at UNC or Chris Johnson did at ECU then, sure a 2nd round guy but he didnt and was a run away heisman winner instead. (I used CJ and GB as comparisojns because i described them both as poor mans reggie bush prior to being drafted)

    Bush had 1740 rushing yards and 18 TDs with highlight after highlight after highlight and almost 9 yards per carry....that is unreal. Archer did get 9 per carry in 2012, but were talking a different animal when it comes to offense and quality of competition
    But since entering the NFL, he has not produced to the level of a top 5 pick. He had tons of talent around him at USC. All I am saying is I think DA could have more highlight, big plays than Bush has.

  4. #14
    Administrator steelz09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    3,629
    Quote Originally Posted by sick beats View Post
    But since entering the NFL, he has not produced to the level of a top 5 pick. He had tons of talent around him at USC. All I am saying is I think DA could have more highlight, big plays than Bush has.
    I hope so... but I'll believe it when I see it. I'm not holding my breadth.

  5. #15
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,859
    D'Anthony Thomas:




    Your move Dri...who was the better pick

  6. #16
    Legend RuthlessBurgher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the Rubber Meets the Road (in NEPA)
    Posts
    21,607
    Quote Originally Posted by K Train View Post
    D'Anthony Thomas:




    Your move Dri...who was the better pick
    If I'm drafting a short guy who weighs less than 180 lbs., give me the guy who gets timed in the 4.2's instead of 4.5, who has a dozen more reps of 225 lbs., and has a vertical jump a half foot higher. But that's just me.

  7. #17
    I agree Ruthless but I wanted Thomas before the draft. The guy plays much faster than a 4.5. I think both are going to be great.

  8. #18
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,859
    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher View Post
    If I'm drafting a short guy who weighs less than 180 lbs., give me the guy who gets timed in the 4.2's instead of 4.5, who has a dozen more reps of 225 lbs., and has a vertical jump a half foot higher. But that's just me.
    Wasnt disputing that. I agree, just more of a comparison of two pretty similar players.

    I want to see archer doing some of that...untouched running

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •