Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Time for New Turf?

  1. #21
    Good solid natural grass field>turf...because there is more forgiveness. But, that isn't what the Steelers have...they have a mud pit which slows them down and IMO is more of an injury risk.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCoast View Post
    Yes, I agree. Having a muddy field on a sunny, perfectly fine autumn day is not the most best way to represent a model NFL franchise.
    I'm not really concerned about this aspect of it. I like other teams dreading to play at Heinz field. IMO, it adds to the mystique of the Steelers nastiness. I am however concerned about neutralizing our speed and having a field with too much give which imo can also be an injury risk. The research on turf does change my mind a bit about the solution however. The solution lies in not sharing the field with anyone else during the season. Is that a possibility? Probably not, as I am assuming it's either a tax issue or a cash cow issue. Money always wins.

  3. #23
    Leave the field as is. Other teams don't like playing on it? Tough. It's called "home-field advantage."
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v437/DBR96/PGH061Asmall.jpg
    Pittsburgh, PA: City of Champions.

  4. #24
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Shawn View Post
    Good solid natural grass field>turf...because there is more forgiveness. But, that isn't what the Steelers have...they have a mud pit which slows them down and IMO is more of an injury risk.
    Yes to this. Natural grass is much better, but when the roots of the grass can't hold and it pulls loose it hurts the direction we are going with more speed on both sides of the ball.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  5. #25
    Legend RuthlessBurgher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the Rubber Meets the Road (in NEPA)
    Posts
    21,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Slapstick View Post
    It isn't sharing the field with Pitt that causes the problem...it's the weekend hosting the WPIAL games...

    They will continue to share and to have natural grass...
    Those are the championship games only, and all 4 of them take place on the same weekend in November. And then the field is re-sodded before the next Steeler game.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by 8467thekraken View Post
    E. & A.-Stop sharing the field so much and let it be.
    I may be wrong, but I thought that sharing the field was part of getting public financing for the stadium.

  7. #27
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,474
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyesq View Post
    I may be wrong, but I thought that sharing the field was part of getting public financing for the stadium.
    it was! However, it is sort of a "Catch-22" because you could actually share it more if it wasn't natural grass and was Field Turf.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  8. #28
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,675
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    Yes to this. Natural grass is much better, but when the roots of the grass can't hold and it pulls loose it hurts the direction we are going with more speed on both sides of the ball.

    i dont see them spending all that money because 2 fast players were drafted, one that might not even be a factor
    1) CB D Dennard
    2) OLB R Shazier
    3) DE J Ellis
    4) WR M Bryant
    5a) OG D Yankey
    5b) OLB J Tripp
    6a) RB D Archer
    6b) NT D McCullers
    7) WR J Janis

  9. #29
    Pro Bowler Jigawatts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Around The Way, OH
    Posts
    2,451
    Natural or artificial ?

    I'll go all natural all day every day.

    Cause silicone parts are made for toys.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by squidkid View Post
    i dont see them spending all that money because 2 fast players were drafted, one that might not even be a factor
    I think 3 fast players were drafted, and a couple more fast free agents were added...might be enough to make a difference...if the sorry field doesn't take that advantage away.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •