Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Is Le'Veon Bell a True Feature Back?

  1. #1
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,261

    Is Le'Veon Bell a True Feature Back?

    Season 320+ Rushers Rush Att Leader Rushes
    2000 5 Eddie George 404
    2001 5 Stephen Davis 359
    2002 5 Ricky Williams 383
    2003 9 Ricky Williams 392
    2004 8 Curtis Martin 370
    2005 8 Shaun Alexander 370
    2006 7 Larry Johnson 417
    2007 3 Clinton Portis 325
    2008 3 Michael Turner 376
    2009 3 Chris Johnson 358
    2010 5 Michael Turner 334
    2011 1 Maurice Jones-Drew 344
    2012 4 Arian Foster 351
    2013 LeSean McCoy 314
    written by
    Joe Redemann
    on May 21st, 2014Follow him at
    @JayArr_FF Some have questioned Bell's completeness as a running back. Can he be the Steelers go-to runner for years to come? I am a huge fan of the TV show How I Met Your Mother. If you haven’t seen it, it’s very much an exaggerated slice of life: simultaneously so absurd and so deep, very emotional and extremely funny. The central action of the show sees Ted Mosby, a hopeless romantic, always chasing after “The One”, the woman he’s supposed to spend the rest of his life with. He often gets into problems, though (duh, it’s a comedy), because he idealizes the women he meets and puts them on a pedestal. He declares his love for them before he even knows them, because he wants so badly to find this one elusive person who will be everything he’d hoped for.
    In a similar way, we do this with our sports heroes. We idealize them, both in personality and in their skills on the playing field. Some fans hope so badly that it’s this year, this quarterback - maybe he’ll be “The One”. As a Packers fan, I mentally begged Ted Thompson for years to draft a running back, and we hope now that maybe Eddie Lacy will stick as “The One”. Players like this can be everything we’ve ever hoped for. That’s the hopeless romantic in us all.
    In a similar vein, the Pittsburgh Steelers drafted a running back in 2013 who they hope can be their “lifelong love” in Le’Veon Bell. His rookie year was very good, despite a scary foot injury, and Steeler fans knew they had their next Jerome Bettis. Then the Pittsburgh brass made a surprising offseason move by acquiring LeGarrette Blount to join their backfield. The Steelers have long been a team dedicated to the notion of a lead-back system, so what could this mean for their opinion on Bell as a complete back? Could this even mean the end of one of the bastions of one-back, smash-mouth football as we remember it?
    Out To PastureEven the most casual NFL fan has seen the ongoing trend of a declining number of true lead backs in the league over the past few years. I discuss this in my running back draft value article here on numberFire. As of now, there are only a few true lead runners left, and even living legend Adrian Peterson of the Minnesota Vikings might reportedly cede some third-down opportunities this year to rookie Jerick McKinnon.
    Were he able to stay healthy last year, Bell would have eclipsed 350 carries in his rookie season. This seems like an unsustainable and unheard of amount in this current league of running back committees and situational specialists. I decided to look at the state of the bell-cow back role in the modern NFL by examining the trend in high volume rushers over the past decade and a half. The chart below shows the amount of running backs by year who eclipsed 320 rushes in a season (20 rushes per game on average).
    Excepting only some blips in 2010 and 2012, the number of true force-fed bell-cow backs has declined rapidly since 2006. Even the total for the season’s leader in rushing attempts has steadily declined as well. The league is transitioning more and more to suit players with specialist roles, and it doesn’t seem to be slowing down any time soon. So, how will this affect our friend Le’Veon?
    Le’Veon Bell CowBell played his college career at Michigan State, and garnered a reputation as a big-bodied player who tried to play too small. He was a good receiver out of the backfield, but didn’t hold up sometimes in pass protection. NFL.com’s scouting profile even compared him to a one Mr. LeGarrette Blount, his new backfield mate in 2014. These concerns must have melted away, as Bell was able to garner an average of 22.23 touches per game as the true focal point of this Steelers offense. How did this impact his performance in the numberFire metrics?
    If you have read a numberFire article before, you know about Net Expected Points (NEP). If you haven’t, this is a measure of a player’s performance as it specifically relates to his team’s probability of scoring on any given drive. You can read more about NEP in our glossary. What we’re interested in for Le’Veon Bell are his Rushing NEP and Reception NEP, which are points accumulated on only rushing attempts and receptions respectively.
    Last year, Bell tallied a -13.85 Rushing NEP (the negative is somewhat misleading; this ranked 25th among the 35 running backs with at least 150 rushes), and 27.86 Reception NEP (8th among backs with at least 150 rushes). Simply put, it’s easier to accumulate positive yardage in chunks via the air, so Bell’s Reception NEP is higher than his Rushing NEP by a large margin. Still, this isn’t so misleading, as Bell’s Rushing Success Rate (the percentage of runs that contributed positively toward his NEP) ranked a still-paltry 22nd among all rushers in this study. It may be possible to chalk up some of Bell’s struggles on the ground to the Steelers’ poor offensive line play in 2013, but with a 39.75% Rush Success Rate, some of it has to be attributed to the player himself.
    The upshot to this is that Bell has the capability to be a proficient three-down back, having alleviated enough concerns about his play in the passing game to be targeted 66 times. Where we must be concerned about his ability is one place that was brought up before the draft and is clearly still a problem: he doesn't get the short, crucial yardage by using his size.
    For Whom The Bell TollsThus, the acquisition of LeGarrette Blount makes perfect sense. Blount is known as a bruising early-down back, and in fact, he had the top Rush Success Rate among all running backs with 150 or more carries in 2013. If Bell can't handle pushing the pile, he will have “Blount Force Trauma” to push him. Based on his physical skills, Bell has the profile to be a complete back and one of the last remaining bell cows in the league. He just has to learn how to be more of a traditional Steelers runner - a power back - as well as a solid receiver.
    He’s on a great team to make it happen, too. The Steelers have long committed to a strong running game, and since 2000 have only had a pass-to-rush ratio above 1.25:1 four times. Also, the addition of offensive line guru Mike Munchak to the Steelers coaching staff should ensure that the Pittsburgh big uglies drastically improve in 2013. If anything about this situation getsbetter, Le’Veon Bell should keep his feature role as a true lead back, and even improve with his natural progression in his sophomore season. I’d put a ring on that.
    http://www.numberfire.com/nfl/news/2...e-feature-back

  2. #2
    Call me Ted because I love me some Le'Veon Bell. I think this was a pretty good write up. But, I will say I think the Steelers don't want Bell running 320 times a season. I think they would like to push it to about that 270-280 mark and protect their investment. I'm almost as excited about Blount who I was very high on (no pun intended) coming out of school. For me, with Dri Archer this is my dream backfield. These are the guys I would hand pick for the Steelers and I get the opportunity to watch em work. Should make for a fun season. And if this OL can play up to half it's potential, teams will have to give them respect. And giving the run game respect means Ben has room to work. If the Steelers have a true deep threat (and that is still a very real question mark), this O will be very difficult to stop.

  3. #3
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    14,675
    I would prefer 225 to 250 on the ground and the rest in the passing game...

    We have other options so there is no reason to run the wheels off of him.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by feltdizz View Post
    I would prefer 225 to 250 on the ground and the rest in the passing game...

    We have other options so there is no reason to run the wheels off of him.
    And I think that is the Steelers intention. Blount will get 5-10 carries per game, Archer will get 3-5, Bell will get 15ish. Archer and Bell will also get their touches in the passing game.

  5. #5
    Legend papillon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Under your bed
    Posts
    7,333
    Like everyone else, I can't imagine Bell getting 320 plus carriers per year, not with a back like Blount available and hopefully, Archer as well.

    Pappy


    1.15) Ryan Shazier - ILB/OLB
    2.46) Stephon Tuitt - DE
    3.97) Dri Archer - RB
    4.118 ) Martavis Bryant - WR
    5.157) Shaquille Richardson - CB
    6.173) Wesley Johnson - OT
    6.192) Jordan Zumwalt - ILB
    7.215) Daniel McCullers - DT
    7.230) Rob Blanchflower - TE

    "Before you can win a game, you have to not lose it." -- Chuck Noll

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,499
    Let's let Bell play his way through his Sophmore season before we crown or drown him. You would assume Munchak will get the OL at the top of its game so the rest will fall on Bell at that point. This is coming from a guy who didn't like him as a 2nd round pick. He's a Steeler & when that happens...I'm wrong & they are right.



  7. #7
    Personally, I am dubbing him Bell The Great.

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,261
    But if you read and believe the article, Bell's greater value is as a pass-catcher, not a runner.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,144
    So many words that can be answered so much quicker. Is Bell a feature back? Yes. I hope they don't give him too many touches, as Tomlin has shown the trait of doing so. That is retarded. Please don't coach retarded. There is no more effective O as one that spreads the ball all around and keeps the D on its heels. Got to give Browns his touches, as well as Miller, Blount and Dri. Don't be a moron, Tomlin.

  10. #10
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,694
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCoast View Post
    But if you read and believe the article, Bell's greater value is as a pass-catcher, not a runner.
    To further that point: I think Bell's value is his versatility, and THAT is how to best utilize him. Take advantage of that versatility, create mismatches in personnel (i.e. use no-huddle, Ben's strength too). It is on the coaching staff to do this.

    If his role is situational (as it is for most RBs today), then he isn't as good as advertised. I'm thinking Marshall Faulk (minus the speed), where they used to get Marshall matched up outside a lot.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •