Do you push the owners to vote for a cap roster exemption or do you just push for a higher cap limit?
The answer seems rather murky. Let's say a team doesn't have a franchise QB (Browns), is it fair to them to have an exemption for a player much further down the cap limit (like a CB or WR)?
I can see where the 'haves' and 'have nots' might be battling this one out. Bottomline, the owners want to control salary costs and it's not clear to me that an exemption would actually serve that purpose.