Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Draft for the defense first guy, however i have to admit,....

  1. #1

    Draft for the defense first guy, however i have to admit,....

    If we drafted Mike Evans to play opposite of Brown and perhaps even brought Santo back to run out of the slot,...our offense could actually become "High powered".
    Last edited by Rod Polamalu; 12-15-2013 at 10:00 PM.

  2. #2
    Legend hawaiiansteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hawaii 5-0
    Posts
    14,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Polamalu View Post
    and perhaps brought Santo back to run out of the slot,...our offense could become "High"..
    there, fixed that for ya...

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Polamalu View Post
    If we drafted Mike Evans to play opposite of Brown and perhaps even brought Santo back to run out of the slot,...our offense could actually become "High powered".
    Holmes ain't coming back to be a backup.

  4. #4
    there, fixed that for ya...


    Hahahaha,.......hey,....we brought the William Gay kid back bro.

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,518

    This is a horrible idea

    No offense to you, or Evans (he may be all that). But drafting that "big WR" #1 is a luxury. I have to believe there will be a better defensive player available--and that is where our #1 pick should be spent.

    I don't even think it is that big a need... e.g. I would much prefer an heir apparent TE (behind Heath).

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe View Post
    No offense to you, or Evans (he may be all that). But drafting that "big WR" #1 is a luxury. I have to believe there will be a better defensive player available--and that is where our #1 pick should be spent.

    I don't even think it is that big a need... e.g. I would much prefer an heir apparent TE (behind Heath).

    I feel you Shoe. I would like to see us land Barr, Nix or Mack with our first selection and come back with with Shazier or Bucannon in the second. Just saying,... i could see how a player like Evans or Amaro could positively impact our offensive productivity in terms of being able to score consistently against any opponent.

  7. #7
    Backup Rara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    442
    Louis Nix or Darqueze Dennard will be our first pick. I would hope Sammy Watkins, Taylor Lewan or Mike Evans will be there...I just see us going for another defensive need again this upcoming Draft.
    Round 1, Pick 15 (15)- Ryan Shazier, ILB; Ohio State
    Round 2, Pick 14 (46)- Stephon Tuitt, DE; Notre Dame
    Round 3b, Pick 33 (97)- Dri Archer, RB; Kent State
    Round 4, Pick 18 (118 )- Martavis Bryant, WR; Clemson
    Round 5, Pick 17 (157)- Shaquille Richardson, CB; Arizona
    Round 5b, Pick 33 (173)- Wesley Johnson, OT; Vanderbilt
    Round 6, Pick 16 (192)- Jordan Zumwalt, OLB; UCLA
    Round 6b, Pick 39 (215)- Daniel McCullers, DT; Tennessee
    Round 7, Pick 15 (230)- Rob Branchflower, TE; Massachusetts

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe View Post
    No offense to you, or Evans (he may be all that). But drafting that "big WR" #1 is a luxury. I have to believe there will be a better defensive player available--and that is where our #1 pick should be spent.

    I don't even think it is that big a need... e.g. I would much prefer an heir apparent TE (behind Heath).
    I agree. I really like Evans but he is indeed a luxury at this point. Also, I believe Wheaton will develop into a good NFL WR. Lets not forget he is still here. I would like to see a Welker like slot guy picked up in the third or later. It is between DB and LT...with a leaning towards LT.

  9. #9
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    12,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Shawn View Post
    I agree. I really like Evans but he is indeed a luxury at this point. Also, I believe Wheaton will develop into a good NFL WR. Lets not forget he is still here. I would like to see a Welker like slot guy picked up in the third or later. It is between DB and LT...with a leaning towards LT.
    yep... we keep talking about big WR's like we don't have one on our team. I know our record is ehhh but our WR production is pretty good.

    I still think our FO believes our LT is already on the team. No way will we pick one in the first when you have 1 or 2 sacks in the last 5 games.

  10. #10
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,194
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Polamalu View Post
    If we drafted Mike Evans to play opposite of Brown and perhaps even brought Santo back to run out of the slot,...our offense could actually become "High powered".
    I would puke in my mouth if we brought Stupidio back. The guy is a bum. I'd keep Cotchery over him without a second thought plus we got Wheaton to learn and run out of the slot.

    Evans would be a nice add to the offense but I fear that people are forgetting what has been scuttling this offense for over three years and that is the mediocre Off Line. Do we really want to kid ourselves into believing this OL is good enough? Did anyone watch us in short yardage last night. Still no push, still no domination.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •