Does anyone else not see a huge dropoff when Worilds replaces LaMarr? Which do you see as the better value for the $$$$?
Does anyone else not see a huge dropoff when Worilds replaces LaMarr? Which do you see as the better value for the $$$$?
one is soft and has money, the other is hungry and wants money
Give me Worilds and 61 million dollar relief. His overall game is better.
[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...
I have always thought that Worilds is better on the left in Woodley's spot. He doesn't have the speed to beat the better LTs of the league but he's got enough strength & quicks to hassle the RTs. That said, he knows he's playing for a contract whether in Pittsburgh or somewhere else, so you'll see high effort when he gets the start.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...
overall game is better than woodleys?
no way, no how.
[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]
Also last year in limited action, he had just as many sacks as Wood.
[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]
a 1 game sample size. Awesome analysis.
I have seen woirlds as a starter when given a chance. No thanks.
Bookmarks