Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Worilds vs. Woodley

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Worilds vs. Woodley

    Does anyone else not see a huge dropoff when Worilds replaces LaMarr? Which do you see as the better value for the $$$$?

  2. #2
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    one is soft and has money, the other is hungry and wants money

  3. #3
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Give me Worilds and 61 million dollar relief. His overall game is better.
    [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

  4. #4
    Pro Bowler

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelhere10 View Post
    Give me Worilds and 61 million dollar relief. His overall game is better.
    Not altogether wrong...the team hasn't exactly gotten the return on that deal they were expecting. For all this talk of trades, Woodley is one I wouldn't cry over if he was dealt.
    It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...

  5. #5
    Pro Bowler

    User Info Menu

    I have always thought that Worilds is better on the left in Woodley's spot. He doesn't have the speed to beat the better LTs of the league but he's got enough strength & quicks to hassle the RTs. That said, he knows he's playing for a contract whether in Pittsburgh or somewhere else, so you'll see high effort when he gets the start.
    It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    overall game is better than woodleys?

    no way, no how.

  7. #7
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie Spaghetti View Post
    overall game is better than woodleys?

    no way, no how.
    woodley doesnt make many tackles

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie Spaghetti View Post
    overall game is better than woodleys?

    no way, no how.
    Worilds have more tackles in limited action, why not. Today he had 7 tackles 4 hurries and a sack. Again why not.
    [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

  9. #9
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Also last year in limited action, he had just as many sacks as Wood.
    [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

  10. #10
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    a 1 game sample size. Awesome analysis.

    I have seen woirlds as a starter when given a chance. No thanks.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •