Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: Jarvis Jones Demoted

  1. 10-29-2013, 04:29 PM #11
    Sugar
    Sugar is offline
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,282
    Quote Originally Posted by Rara View Post
    I, for one, am still happy to have Jarvis Jones. He's young yet...Worilds didn't start right away, Woodley didn't start right away (both are second round picks). Give the kid some time, still green yet.
    Agreed. He's still young. Troy and Timmons weren't great at first either and now both are fantastic. I'm confident he'll be fine in time.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-29-2013, 04:34 PM #12
    SidSmythe
    SidSmythe is offline
    Hall of Famer SidSmythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Western NY (south of Rochester, NY)
    Posts
    3,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Sugar View Post
    Agreed. He's still young. Troy and Timmons weren't great at first either and now both are fantastic. I'm confident he'll be fine in time.
    We don't want "fine" ... we want a beast!!!
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-29-2013, 04:35 PM #13
    Sugar
    Sugar is offline
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,282
    Quote Originally Posted by SidSmythe View Post
    We don't want "fine" ... we want a beast!!!
    He might end up as a beast, either way I think he'll end up playing to his draft grade within three years.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-29-2013, 04:40 PM #14
    Oviedo
    Oviedo is offline
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    16,496
    Quote Originally Posted by squidkid View Post
    i agree but for gods sake why can other teams draft guys in a variety of rounds and have them start or have an impact right away but we have to wait years?
    oh, and i dont want to hear how we are great and dont have that many spots open for draft picks to take over
    That's the $100,000 question. Why can these young guys start and do well on other teams but not us? I have my opinions, but lets make excuses anyway.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-29-2013, 04:43 PM #15
    buccoray61
    buccoray61 is offline
    Starter
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    784
    Quote Originally Posted by Sugar View Post
    He might end up as a beast, either way I think he'll end up playing to his draft grade within three years.
    I agree,but I was hoping for a fast start,as this team is desperate for play makers.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-29-2013, 05:10 PM #16
    Sugar
    Sugar is offline
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,282
    Quote Originally Posted by buccoray61 View Post
    I agree,but I was hoping for a fast start,as this team is desperate for play makers.
    The fact that he has started on this D is already a fast start by Steelers standards.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-29-2013, 05:45 PM #17
    SteelCrazy
    SteelCrazy is offline
    Hall of Famer SteelCrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    4,598
    ....at the end of that article it said there hasn't been a 100 yard rusher yet in the AFC North. That's crazy.......
    2017 Mock

    1. T.J Watt, OLB/DE, Wisconsin - will be a huge mistake if available and we pass

    2. Cordrea Tankersley, CB, Clemson

    3. Josh Jones, S, N.C. State

    3. Adam Shaheen, TE, Ashland

    4. Trey Hendrickson, DE, Florida Atlantic

    5. Josh Reynolds, WR, Texas A&M

    6. Barry Sanders, RB, Oklahoma State (How can you go wrong with that name, however the sample size is so small that his dad may be better even in his 50's)

    7. Alec Torgersen, QB, Pennsylvania
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-29-2013, 06:11 PM #18
    Eddie Spaghetti
    Eddie Spaghetti is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,970
    I can see why, but dont agree with it.

    worilds is a bum and always has been no matter how he has been propped up by some here.

    at this point in a meaningless season, the coaching staff should be getting JJ as many reps as possible, as it will only help him going forward.
    Last edited by Eddie Spaghetti; 10-29-2013 at 06:13 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-29-2013, 06:25 PM #19
    flippy
    flippy is offline
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie Spaghetti View Post
    I can see why, but dont agree with it.

    worilds is a bum and always has been no matter how he has been propped up by some here.

    at this point in a meaningless season, the coaching staff should be getting JJ as many reps as possible, as it will only help him going forward.
    Guys can learn from watching too. I don't see it as that bad a thing. Plus maybe it makes him a little mad and he ends up working harder to get his job back.

    If a guy is overmatched and lost out there and doing the wrong stuff, the wrong stuff can end up turning into a habit which can also be bad.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-29-2013, 06:28 PM #20
    Eddie Spaghetti
    Eddie Spaghetti is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,970
    we will agree to disagree, flip

    jones can use every rep he can get, IMO

    worilds gives us nothing going forward
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules