6ft 4 220 plus with an accurate rocket arm? Just sayin....

**feltdizz** · 10-31-2013, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by SS Laser

Wonder if Dallas might have had it good with one of the greatest running backs off all time with a game manger qb. I dont think that type of trade would work out that well. There was some good drafting going on there. Screw up the qb pick game over.

I Also don't think this team is as bad as there record. They will be back to form next season I think.

Dallas traded a RB... if they traded a SB winning QB or a QB with 3 SB appearances I could see his point but notice how Dub can't find that type of trade because teams NEVER trade SB winners who still have something left in the tank.

**buccoray61** · 10-31-2013, 04:08 PM

If you are banking on a Walker type of trade to lift the Steelers,you might as well keep Ben and bank on a 1974 type draft,both were lighting in a bottle type of events. I'll keep Ben,thanks

**Dee Dub** · 10-31-2013, 04:15 PM

Originally Posted by feltdizz

this is weird... actually I got bored hearing you repeat the same stat over and over again.

It doesn't how many times you repeat the Dallas trade of 1989 because they didn't trade a franchise QB...

The Cowboys received 4 players and 8 draft picks for this RB. It doesn't matter the position. Trading a franchise QB still in his prime should net a pretty healthy return. My whole point is, the return that can be gotten by the Steelers should they make Ben available and how that return could turn this franchise around as soon as it did the Cowboys.

But focus on dumb stuff.

**Dee Dub** · 10-31-2013, 04:17 PM

Originally Posted by SS Laser

.....I Also don't think this team is as bad as there record. They will be back to form next season I think.

How? They are going to be the 3rd highest over the cap come this next off season. Please tell us your formula for how they will be back next year. They will be worse.

**feltdizz** · 10-31-2013, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by Dee Dub

The Cowboys received 4 players and 8 draft picks for this RB. It doesn't matter the position. Trading a franchise QB still in his prime should net a pretty healthy return. My whole point is, the return that can be gotten by the Steelers should they make Ben available and how that return could turn this franchise around as soon as it did the Cowboys.

But focus on dumb stuff.

The position DOES matter....

**ikestops85** · 10-31-2013, 05:43 PM

Originally Posted by feltdizz

Dallas traded a RB... if they traded a SB winning QB or a QB with 3 SB appearances I could see his point but notice how Dub can't find that type of trade because teams NEVER trade SB winners who still have something left in the tank.

I guess you don't remember the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. They had a QB that was in his prime and they left him go. They brought Elvis into the building.

**Dee Dub** · 10-31-2013, 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by feltdizz

The position DOES matter....

Ok explain for what reason? Because the Steelers should get more in return for a franchise QB who has won 2 super bowls than a near washed up RB?

Exactly.

**feltdizz** · 10-31-2013, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by Dee Dub

Ok explain for what reason? Because the Steelers should get more in return for a franchise QB who has won 2 super bowls than a near washed up RB?

Exactly.

Yeah... exactly.