What is funny is to make the case for Lee being injury prone (Which topic BTW I did not start)when WE TOOK a guy (Worilds) who cant be a healthy "backup" for being fragile.
not according to the steelers
which if im to beleive you're arguement in the wallace case, makes you wrong about lee/worldis.
go steelers....cant question anything they do... they have the most SB championships RAH RAH RAH
PS. you wouldnt happen to be a PSU fan, would you?
so thats the reason we gave a guy with this as his resume
2011 69 catches 1,108 yards 16.1 avg. 2 TDs 10.8 avg on 30 punt returns 27.3 avg on 27 kickoff returns
2010 16 catches 167 yards 10.4 avg. 0 TDs 5.8 avg on 19 punt returns 23.4 avg on 17 kickoff returns
$7M per year?
probably would have been better off not signing either then. would have forced us to try and get a true #1 type receiver in the draft
Now I completely miss the correlation between the linebackers and the receivers in question here. Many thought before the draft that Lee was better. I dare say most draftniks had Lee higher.
I fail to see that relating to a receiver WE TRIED TO SIGN who refused to and SETTLING for another receiver.
This is the problem NJ.
No matter what we say, no matter the facts, you argue that Wallace was better yet we chose Brown.
The facts do not support that the team chose Brown over Wallace. Very few here believe that. Those who do are ignoring the facts.
High school dance. Girl 1 turns you down, you need to move on to girl two.
Dont blame the dude who is doing the asking if you think girl one was finer.
That is all it comes down to. It aint rocket science, really.