Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Bell Getting Work w/ the #1's this Saturday vs. the Giants (ESPN.com)

  1. #11
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,861
    Quote Originally Posted by feltdizz View Post
    I remember Dwyer making a sweet catch on the sideline...

    IMO we just refused to throw to the RB's as the 1st option
    Dwyer dropped a few last night that he should have made. On the otherhand, the Steelers have a FB that has great hands and showed it again last night. WJohnson can and should be used more in this offense.

  2. #12
    Legend hawaiiansteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hawaii 5-0
    Posts
    14,768
    Steelers waiting for glut of quality running backs to sort themselves out

    By Alan Robinson
    Published: Monday, August 12, 2013

    Five running backs. One football. Two weeks.

    That's the Steelers' dilemma.

    No team has run the ball better over the last 43 seasons than the Steelers — no one is close — but few ran it worse last season. Offensive coordinator Todd Haley said they've got to get it fixed, and now, for the passing game to thrive, but what remains unsettled is who will be the primary running back Sept. 8 against Tennessee.

    Le'Veon Bell, a rookie but still the favorite? Isaac Redman, who showed during a 147-yard game last season that he can be a force? Jonathan Dwyer, who is competing not just for a starting job but an job, period? LaRod Stephens-Howling, who will get the ball primarily on third down, not first or second? Or even Baron Batch, who earned his way last season with his special teams play?

    With the starters unlikely to play much Aug. 29 at Carolina, the games Monday at Washington and Aug. 24 against the Chiefs could sort out the Steelers' complicated, unwieldy and, the way it is currently constructed, unworkable excess of running backs.

    “I've got to go out there and earn the job,” Bell said Monday. “They're not going to give it to me regardless of where I was drafted or what the team needs.”

    All of the backs will get time with the starters the next two weeks. The two games won't solely determine the starter — Haley said even walkthroughs are being thoroughly evaluated — but game action almost always dictates the final word.

    And who will be the last man running?

    “I wouldn't read anything into it in terms of the rotation, but the outcome of it will be a clear indicator of who's got the ability and how they rank,” running backs coach Kirby Wilson said Monday. “Visually, you'll be able to see some of that with how they perform with the first team offensive line.”

    Bell was expected to get most of the first-team carries Saturday against the Giants, but a bruised knee kept him out. Stephens-Howling, the former Pitt running back who previously played with the Cardinals, took advantage of Bell's absence by carrying seven times for 40 yards behind an offensive line that repeatedly manhandled the Giants' defensive line.

    “LaRod threw his hat into the ring and got us excited, which he's been doing out here,” Haley said. “When it happens in a game, that's a good thing.”

    Redman started but got only two carries before being pulled, and he said it felt like “someone giving you a steak, then giving you two pieces and pulling it back.”

    Bell, the second-round draft pick who led the Big Ten in rushing last season by averaging 137.92 yards per game for Michigan State, is exciting the Steelers at camp with his power running and attention to detail.

    “I'm extremely pleased with the way he works, the way he's handling himself, the way he's preparing,” Wilson said. “His mindset is always focusing in on assignments and he hasn't had a mental error the entire camp, which is rare. I've never in my 16 years in the league seen that happen.”

    Still, Wilson said, “That position, they determine it based on how they perform. I don't think that will change.

    “The grades will pan out and guys who can make plays will make plays. The guys who continue to make mistakes and don't make plays, it will all sort itself out.”

    The Steelers already know what Jonathan Dwyer (623 yards, 4.0 average in 2012) and Redman (410 yards, 3.7 average) can do. But if Bell can do what the Steelers anticipate he can do — and that's be a feature back-quality runner — it might not make any difference.

    “Oh, gosh, I would have loved to have seen him Saturday night,” Wilson said.

    http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/...#ixzz2bq0WvIqO

  3. #13
    Backup
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    199
    Only thing I hope is NOT true is the experts who compare Bell's game, and style to that of former Steeler RB Tim Worley.
    Worley was also a very Big ( 6ft, 2, 230 Lbs )...who like Bell liked to side-step, and use his quick feet, rather then just use his size to Ram into Defenders. I don't know about alot of you, but I remember Worley, and even though his career was derailed by Injury that he never really recovered from, I still never liked his game/style. He was all fluff. A sissy boy. Never ever liked to take a hit. I remember seeing DB's who were maybe 155 Lbs at MOST totally blow Worley up at the Line. But even though Bell has the same size and traits. I also see Bell more then willing to Hit a defender if he has to. So as long as he can stay away from the Tim Worley comparisons....I will be fine.

  4. #14
    Ummm....Worley also had drug issues...

  5. #15
    Backup
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    199
    That had nothing to do with his game son. Facts are both Worley and Bell are exactly the same size...Worley was much faster though..I remember him timed at 4.37 in the forty. But they both relied on their feet, rather then their strength and Power.

  6. #16
    Alan needs a good editor.

  7. #17
    Concerning Bell...“His mindset is always focusing in on assignments and he hasn't had a mental error the entire camp, which is rare. I've never in my 16 years in the league seen that happen.”


  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by sedatedsteelerfan View Post
    Only thing I hope is NOT true is the experts who compare Bell's game, and style to that of former Steeler RB Tim Worley.
    Worley was also a very Big ( 6ft, 2, 230 Lbs )...who like Bell liked to side-step, and use his quick feet, rather then just use his size to Ram into Defenders. I don't know about alot of you, but I remember Worley, and even though his career was derailed by Injury that he never really recovered from, I still never liked his game/style. He was all fluff. A sissy boy. Never ever liked to take a hit. I remember seeing DB's who were maybe 155 Lbs at MOST totally blow Worley up at the Line. But even though Bell has the same size and traits. I also see Bell more then willing to Hit a defender if he has to. So as long as he can stay away from the Tim Worley comparisons....I will be fine.
    Anyone who has ever watched Bell run realizes he is no "sissy boy". The guy can flat out run over guys...but chooses to use his feet to avoid unneccesary contact. He knows how to get yards, protect his body, and will still lay down the hammer when needed. He is the best back we have had here since Bettis.

  9. #19
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Shawn View Post
    Anyone who has ever watched Bell run realizes he is no "sissy boy". The guy can flat out run over guys...but chooses to use his feet to avoid unneccesary contact. He knows how to get yards, protect his body, and will still lay down the hammer when needed. He is the best back we have had here since Bettis.
    Wasn't there another Steeler RB that was criticised for going out of bounds to avoid contact? Who was that gu? Oh, yea- FRANCO HARRIS!! I'm not saying Bell is the second coming of Franco, but to me that's just as easy to say as saying he's the second coming of Tim Worley.

  10. #20
    Hall of Famer SidSmythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Western NY (south of Rochester, NY)
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by sedatedsteelerfan View Post
    That had nothing to do with his game son. Facts are both Worley and Bell are exactly the same size...Worley was much faster though..I remember him timed at 4.37 in the forty. But they both relied on their feet, rather then their strength and Power.
    I really don't think b/c they have the same size that you can make any comparisons. Size is one thing, mentality is not measured by a man's size.
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •