Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: We Reached According to the Cowboys

  1. #1
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,372

    We Reached According to the Cowboys

    The entire Cowboy's 2013 draft board was re-constructed here:
    http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2013/...-7-round-board

    They left most of our guys completely off their draft board. The only ones on their board were Bell (3rd), Wheaton (3rd), and Landry (6th). So according to their board we only got fair value in 1 pick. We overdrafted on 2 others. And the rest they wouldn't have even wanted.

    I thought this was one of the more interesting football articles so far this offseason, but am especially surprised reading it thru my black and gold lenses. I thought we had a great draft. Apparently the Cowboys would have given us an F according to their board.

  2. #2
    No doubt Jarvis and shark werent on their board. They are right we did reach with those 2 for sure. Prolly that ****ty okla receiver too.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolie Man View Post
    No doubt Jarvis and shark werent on their board. They are right we did reach with those 2 for sure. Prolly that ****ty okla receiver too.
    Cowboys are running the 4/3 again. Players who are projected 3/4 Lbers are DEs on their board.
    JJ is too small to be a DE and is not a 4/3 type LB. He is a horrible fot for their defense, but in no way indicative of a "reach" by us.

    To call Shark a reach is just plain ridiculous. Perhaps the best athlete at his position? Productive in college? Really?

    Try this......recall the pre-draft projections of Lake if you remember. Nobody had him in the second (too small lber). The Ourlads of the world had no clue. But the Steelers knew.

    Fastest safety, held his own locking down an all american type receiver, beast against the run.

    Dude was taken in the stinkin 4th, it aint like he was top 10 in the first.

    Best athete at his position in THE FOURTH round. Not like he is an unproductive combine only type either.
    That is a value and a steal.

    The Ok receiver....yeah not real excited about that one

  4. #4
    Legend hawaiiansteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hawaii 5-0
    Posts
    15,071
    after the Cowgirls traded up for CB Morris Claiborne in last year's draft, here are the rest of the choices they made:

    3- Tyrone Crawford, DE, Boise State (6-4, 275); 4 - Kyle Wilber, OLB, Wake Forest (6-4, 249); 4 - Matt Johnson, S, Eastern Washington (6-1, 211); 5 - Danny Coale, WR, Virginia Tech (6-0, 201); 6 - James Hanna, TE (6-4, 252); 7 - Caleb McSurdy, ILB, Montana (6-1, 245)

    who cares what Jerry Jones thinks?

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer DukieBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,123
    The thread header increases my confidence in our draft.
    PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL






  6. #6
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,372
    I thought it was really interesting to see another teams board with almost none of our draftees. I was also surprised they left off some of the high risk/reward players. I always view Dallas as a team for taking chances where the player has a high ceiling.

  7. #7
    Backup Rara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by hawaiiansteel View Post
    after the Cowgirls traded up for CB Morris Claiborne in last year's draft, here are the rest of the choices they made:

    3- Tyrone Crawford, DE, Boise State (6-4, 275); 4 - Kyle Wilber, OLB, Wake Forest (6-4, 249); 4 - Matt Johnson, S, Eastern Washington (6-1, 211); 5 - Danny Coale, WR, Virginia Tech (6-0, 201); 6 - James Hanna, TE (6-4, 252); 7 - Caleb McSurdy, ILB, Montana (6-1, 245)

    who cares what Jerry Jones thinks?
    They're just jealous they aren't the Pittsburgh Steelers.
    Round 1, Pick 15 (15)- Ryan Shazier, ILB; Ohio State
    Round 2, Pick 14 (46)- Stephon Tuitt, DE; Notre Dame
    Round 3b, Pick 33 (97)- Dri Archer, RB; Kent State
    Round 4, Pick 18 (118 )- Martavis Bryant, WR; Clemson
    Round 5, Pick 17 (157)- Shaquille Richardson, CB; Arizona
    Round 5b, Pick 33 (173)- Wesley Johnson, OT; Vanderbilt
    Round 6, Pick 16 (192)- Jordan Zumwalt, OLB; UCLA
    Round 6b, Pick 39 (215)- Daniel McCullers, DT; Tennessee
    Round 7, Pick 15 (230)- Rob Branchflower, TE; Massachusetts

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by DukieBoy View Post
    The thread header increases my confidence in our draft.
    Ain't that the truth

  9. #9
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hotlanta
    Posts
    2,063
    Over the last 5 years the Cowboys have finished 3rd in their division 4 out of 5 times. 3 of those years they did not have a winning record. I would hope the draft boards look incredibly different than this team that's been a non-factor in the NFL for years now.

  10. #10
    Would your reaction be different if this was the Browns' board? The Bills board? The Raiders? Well, Jerry Jones has had more hype, but not much more success than those teams over the past few years.

    Aside from that though, most teams should have differences in their boards. Look at the WR position. The Cowboys enter camp with Dez Bryant and Miles Austin as their starters. The Steelers enter with Antonio Brown and Emmanuel Sanders as theirs. Who would you think would have a receiver rated higher on their board?

    We drafted Jarvis Jones in the first. He has no incumbent in front of him. If the Cowboys were still running the 3-4, he would have Demarcus Ware ahead of him. They would not have the luxury with their other needs.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •