Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 103

Thread: Steelers, Packers interested in Ahmad Bradshaw

  1. #51
    Backup
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    452
    Rotating running backs is Haley's staple.

    It's also a waste of time.

  2. #52
    Pro Bowler supersteeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by Siggy00 View Post
    Rotating running backs is Haley's staple.

    It's also a waste of time.
    Le'veon Bell would end Haley's staple once he puts on the cleats on for the Steelers if they draft him. Running back by committee is for the birds.

  3. #53
    Hall of Famer Mister Pittsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,678
    Quote Originally Posted by Siggy00 View Post
    Rotating running backs is Haley's staple.

    It's also a waste of time.
    Yeah, what a waste to have the #1 rushing attack in the NFL and almost two 1,000yd rushers on the team...

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/kc/year/2010
    @_Hellgrammite

  4. #54
    Backup
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    452
    And what happened in the playoffs?

    Starched.

    Embarrassed.

    Humiliated.

  5. #55
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    1,997
    Quote Originally Posted by Siggy00 View Post
    And what happened in the playoffs?

    Starched.

    Embarrassed.


    Humiliated.
    Nice try to save yourself

  6. #56
    Backup
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    452
    Not at all. The AFC West is a joke. Only Dick LeBeau's overrated scheme lost to it in the playoffs.

    Rivers has been a post season choker for years.

    Peyton sucked ass against the Ravens with three turnovers.

    And the 2010 Chiefs got worked as well.

    They play real teams and they get whacked.

  7. #57
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Australia
    Posts
    5,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Siggy00 View Post
    Not at all. The AFC West is a joke. Only Dick LeBeau's overrated scheme lost to it in the playoffs.

    Rivers has been a post season choker for years.

    Peyton sucked ass against the Ravens with three turnovers.

    And the 2010 Chiefs got worked as well.

    They play real teams and they get whacked.
    Hang on a minute- one minute you are discussing how the rotation RB scheme is no good, and to justify it you show that Rivers is overrated & Manning chokes in playoff games?

    Aren't they both QB's?

    What are we arguing here?
    Schiavone's Race Career:

    Starts- 9
    Wins- 1
    2nd- 4
    3rd- 0
    Other- 4

    Prizemoney- $28,050.00


  8. #58
    Backup
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    452
    The Chiefs rotation can work in a garbage division.

    Then they played the WILD CARD TEAM from the AFC North at home and got destroyed.

  9. #59
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Australia
    Posts
    5,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Siggy00 View Post
    The Chiefs rotation can work in a garbage division.

    Then they played the WILD CARD TEAM from the AFC North at home and got destroyed.
    Hold your horses..

    Against the Ravens- a team KNOWN to be strong against the run, the Chiefs had 14 rushes for 98 yards. Charles averaged 9.1 YPC per carry.

    the Chiefs didn't lose because of a crappy running game.

    They lost because Matt Cassell was their QB.

    Now, unless you are about to argue that Ben is on par with Cassell as a starting QB, the Steelers shouldn't suffer the same kind of fate if they get that sort of production on the ground...
    Schiavone's Race Career:

    Starts- 9
    Wins- 1
    2nd- 4
    3rd- 0
    Other- 4

    Prizemoney- $28,050.00


  10. #60
    Backup
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    452
    They had slightly over 100 yards if I recall, I think 40 of it came on one carry in the first half from Charles. Jones did nothing in that game.

    If we try to be the 2010 Chiefs? We won't win 6 games.

    And what's sad? Is that's exactly where we are headed as a team.

    Sad.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •