Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 103

Thread: Steelers, Packers interested in Ahmad Bradshaw

  1. 03-18-2013, 01:02 PM #21
    Mister Pittsburgh
    Mister Pittsburgh is offline
    Hall of Famer Mister Pittsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,678
    Quote Originally Posted by JUST-PLAIN-NASTY View Post
    We can also play "connect the dots" with Jack Bicknell being with Bradshaw on the Giants from '09-'11 as the Assistant OL coach. I'm sure he will have input. If healthy...Will come down to price and if he wants to continue to be part of a winning organization. Maybe Plax can help. He was Bradshaw's team mate for 2 years. Just watch some highlights of Badshaw from 2012. He was playing on that injured foot in some of these. Does this resemble anything we saw out of the Steelers running game last year? One of the reasons I stress "NFL resume" is this. Dwyer is very young and even with Bradshaw signing, there will be a draft choice here. The curent stable had Mendy as the example of being a Pro. That is all I need to say about how important it would be to have a presence of a RB with some type of resume.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snLjlYASBUM




    Good points on the former teammate in Plax and former coach in Bicknell. Didn't think of that.....
    @_Hellgrammite
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-18-2013, 01:19 PM #22
    Rara
    Rara is offline
    Backup Rara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Pittsburgh View Post
    Good points on the former teammate in Plax and former coach in Bicknell. Didn't think of that.....
    Interesting...I'd like to get Bradshaw..if not, trade for Blount. Tampa is trying to trade him.
    Round 1, Pick 15 (15)- Ryan Shazier, ILB; Ohio State
    Round 2, Pick 14 (46)- Stephon Tuitt, DE; Notre Dame
    Round 3b, Pick 33 (97)- Dri Archer, RB; Kent State
    Round 4, Pick 18 (118 )- Martavis Bryant, WR; Clemson
    Round 5, Pick 17 (157)- Shaquille Richardson, CB; Arizona
    Round 5b, Pick 33 (173)- Wesley Johnson, OT; Vanderbilt
    Round 6, Pick 16 (192)- Jordan Zumwalt, OLB; UCLA
    Round 6b, Pick 39 (215)- Daniel McCullers, DT; Tennessee
    Round 7, Pick 15 (230)- Rob Branchflower, TE; Massachusetts
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-18-2013, 01:38 PM #23
    phillyesq
    phillyesq is offline
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,099
    Quote Originally Posted by Rara View Post
    Interesting...I'd like to get Bradshaw..if not, trade for Blount. Tampa is trying to trade him.
    I'm not that interested in Blount. He doesn't really bring anything to the table that Dwyer doesn't.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-18-2013, 02:31 PM #24
    lloydroid
    lloydroid is offline
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,026
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyesq View Post
    I'm not that interested in Blount. He doesn't really bring anything to the table that Dwyer doesn't.
    Well, Blount can rush the ball more than twice before asking to come out of the game. There is that.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-18-2013, 05:41 PM #25
    ikestops85
    ikestops85 is offline
    Hall of Famer ikestops85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Chadman View Post
    Still think Kevin Smith might be worth a look..
    Chadman, I like the Lions plastic running backs also except my pick would be Javid Best ... if he ever get medical clearance to play again.
    <a href=http://seahawknationblog.com/files/2011/02/roger-goodell.jpg target=_blank>http://seahawknationblog.com/files/2...er-goodell.jpg</a>
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-18-2013, 07:51 PM #26
    Mister Pittsburgh
    Mister Pittsburgh is offline
    Hall of Famer Mister Pittsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,678
    KFFL has reported the Steelers are not pursuing Bradshaw at this point.
    @_Hellgrammite
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-18-2013, 11:39 PM #27
    skyhawk
    skyhawk is offline
    Pro Bowler skyhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Pittsburgh View Post
    KFFL has reported the Steelers are not pursuing Bradshaw at this point.
    crap........
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-19-2013, 12:42 AM #28
    BradshawsHairdresser
    BradshawsHairdresser is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,888
    Conner...Butler...Jake Long...Dumervil...Bradshaw...At this point, I have to wonder if the Steelers were ever really pursuing any of these players. I'm suspecting it's all maybe more for appearance sake, to try and convince their fans they're attempting to do something in FA.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-19-2013, 12:59 AM #29
    pittpete
    pittpete is offline
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    1,994
    Quote Originally Posted by BradshawsHairdresser View Post
    Conner...Butler...Jake Long...Dumervil...Bradshaw...At this point, I have to wonder if the Steelers were ever really pursuing any of these players. I'm suspecting it's all maybe more for appearance sake, to try and convince their fans they're attempting to do something in FA.
    Yes, because this is the only year that we havn't aggressively pursued other teams free agents
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-19-2013, 07:32 AM #30
    Sugar
    Sugar is offline
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,087
    Quote Originally Posted by BradshawsHairdresser View Post
    Conner...Butler...Jake Long...Dumervil...Bradshaw...At this point, I have to wonder if the Steelers were ever really pursuing any of these players. I'm suspecting it's all maybe more for appearance sake, to try and convince their fans they're attempting to do something in FA.
    Maybe it's not the fans they are trying to convince? I don't think the Steelers feel like they need to convince the fans of anything. They know that even those who complain now will be back on the bandwagon when they start winning again.

    IMO, it's possible that they make a play for these guys to see if they can get one to "bite." If so, great. If not, no big loss.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules