If it hadn't been for this response Chadman might have missed this comment. Probably would have been ok with that...
Still, in the name of charity & goodwill, in response to the 'hypocrisy' comment- the problem is not necessarily 'inflamatory posts', so much as the volume of 'inflamatory posts'. Some posters seem more prone to sprouting 'made for emotive' responses than others...
The people that are trying to make the world worse never take a day off, why should I?
Light up the darkness.
2024 Draft
1. Kool-Aid McKinstry CB
2. Sedrick Van Pran-Grainger OC
3. Devontez Walker WR
3. Maason Smith DT
4. Matt Goncalves OT
6. Trevin Wallace ILB
7. AJ Barner TE
chadman usually hits the right notes when he decides to provoke banter.
others, not so much.
Aww shucks.... you guys...
The people that are trying to make the world worse never take a day off, why should I?
Light up the darkness.
2024 Draft
1. Kool-Aid McKinstry CB
2. Sedrick Van Pran-Grainger OC
3. Devontez Walker WR
3. Maason Smith DT
4. Matt Goncalves OT
6. Trevin Wallace ILB
7. AJ Barner TE
Hmmm, not really a complete answer. You haven't commented purely on volume (you have, but not always) but you have whined about reactionary posts....but then you admittedly did the same. When you speak out against something but then practice the very same act, as you condemn, it's still hypocrisy. No different than anti gay republicans getting caught soliciting for oral sex in a male bathroom.
[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/03/larry-craig-airport-bathroom_n_1739142.html[/url]
I don't care about your proclivities...
When Chadman makes an "inflammatory post" there are two things present that are lacking in your posts:
1) A long track record of quality posts. This earns you some latitude in the eyes of fellow posters. You do not have this.
2) A sense of irony, which most of the posters here find amusing. You, for the most part, are not amusing.
Bookmarks