
Originally Posted by
Chadman
Starting to think we are reading the same article, but getting a different understanding of it..
So, to clarify where we stand on this, Chadman's understanding is that:
A- Brown steps in for Ward into the X position, Wallace was in the Z.
B- Brown doesn't understand the routes of the X position, so Wallace & Brown swap- Wallace moves from Z to X.
C- Brown shines in Z position, a la Wallace, Wallace's numbers drop as a result of different routes.
D- Wallace is unhappy about this because he's in his contract year- lower production = lower pay.
E- Wallace doesn't get offered the money he wants, Brown gets healthy pay increase.
F- Wallace & Brown swap back responsibilities this season- Brown is now statistically inferior to Wallace again.
Is that how everyone read that article?
If so- Chadman can understand the frustration.
Bookmarks