Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Should Lebeau Move Harrison Inside?

  1. #1
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,369

    Should Lebeau Move Harrison Inside?

    Could we benefit from moving James Harrison inside next to Timmons and let Worilds play OLB?

    Harrison's knee/back may make him less of a pass rusher. He's kinda small already and it may be tough to be his size and get so much leverage given his health. But he's as good as any LB I've ever seen at navigating through traffic to make tackles.

    And we could cross him with Timmons to manufacture pressure up the middle.

    Bottom line - Would we be better with

    a. Woodley - Timmons - Foote - Harrison

    or

    b. Woodley - Timmons - Harrison - Worilds

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer Mister Pittsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,678
    maybe with all the passing that goes on, we should bench Hampton and replace him with Worilds and they all float around and kick butt. Runa 2-5

  3. #3
    Is it my imagination, or does Worilds look much more effective when he plays in Woodley's LOLB spot as opposed to Harrison's ROLB position?

  4. #4
    Pro Bowler BigRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    1,381
    Quote Originally Posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o. View Post
    Is it my imagination, or does Worilds look much more effective when he plays in Woodley's LOLB spot as opposed to Harrison's ROLB position?
    Not your imagination.

  5. #5
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,332
    Harrison would IMO look great at MLB in our 4-3 defense next year!
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    Harrison would IMO look great at MLB in our 4-3 defense next year!
    Do you need coffee? You seem to have fallen into some dreamland.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    Harrison would IMO look great at MLB in our 4-3 defense next year!
    I thought you wanted a tampa-2 style 43 defense, where you need a MLB with speed like Urlacher to drop back and cover the deep middle. Or has your preference changed now?

  8. #8
    Pro Bowler D Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,317
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyesq View Post
    I thought you wanted a tampa-2 style 43 defense, where you need a MLB with speed like Urlacher to drop back and cover the deep middle. Or has your preference changed now?
    Urlacher was an animal last night in coverage.

  9. #9
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,332
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyesq View Post
    I thought you wanted a tampa-2 style 43 defense, where you need a MLB with speed like Urlacher to drop back and cover the deep middle. Or has your preference changed now?

    I prefer the 4-3 but never said it had to be Tampa 2. The way the Giants play it suits me just fine.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  10. #10
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    I prefer the 4-3 but never said it had to be Tampa 2. The way the Giants play it suits me just fine.
    Does the Giants DLine come with that switch?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •