Since when is Jim McMahon a multiple SB winner, let alone a multiple SB starter?Originally Posted by stopplayn
Since when is Jim McMahon a multiple SB winner, let alone a multiple SB starter?
They are very elite and were the PRIMARY reasons their teams were elite. They also didnt habitually lose to quarterbacks like Gradkowkski, Walter, Tebow and Matt Hasselbeck. Ben has lost to some HORRIBLE qbs. I know I know. Its the Defenses fault. Ben gets credit for the wins but NEVER blame in the losses. I get it.
Mcmahon won a SB with the PACKERS as Favres backup. So he is a multiple SB winner. Dont engage if you arent mentally capable.
According to you on Planet Stopplayn, that may be true...
Ben Roethlisberger needs an elite Defense to win games. When the defense fails we lose. Troy Polamalu is more important to the Steelers than the Qb and thats a problem.
That's faulty logic...by the same token, you might as well call Charlie Batch eliteas well...
If you are going to be immature and insulting, don't bother enaging me in the future...I see what you have to resort to doing once your argument is shut down...
When you grow up, come back and debate some football...
Uh... its a fact. One that you didnt know. I dont call Batch elite, nor Ben, nor Mcmahon or Plunkett. Precisely why I made the comparison. Dont know how I have been defeated. I merely proved you are not on my level. AGAIN. But ok
The low level where insults are thrown when arguments are refuted? You can have it...
the mods need to ban this stopplayn from this forum. He is nothing more than a troll!!!!!!
What argument did you refute? You said Mcmahon isnt a multiple SB winner. I proved he was. What exactly did you refute?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks