And? Where is the ad hominem attack? If anything, my point was made crystal clear. If one is claiming that a "real back" can play through turf toe, then one would be indicting Jack Lambert as not being a "real LB" since turf toe made him not only miss games, but retire. I don't know what you are tripping all over yourself about. My assertion was logical: One cannot make the claim that a "real back" could play through turf toe without indicting Lambert as being "not real."
Also, note at who slighted the other first. Did you fail to notice that part? I believe you have selective reading and comprehension; you see things that are not there and fail to notice things that are.