We will agree to.disagree... I'm not ignoring the last 3 years vs Nevada, they have been a thorn in Boise's side IMO and I think most teams in the Big East are better than Nevada...
I've been a Boise fan since they beat OU in amazing fashion but I'm not.ready to crown them BE champs based on their success vs BCS teams... a full season vs better opponents will tell us a lot about the future of the BE conference and Boise's standing in the BCS hunt. I just wish they weren't screwed over by the BCS few years, playing TCU instead of new foe the other year was a travesty.
have a good one.
i think they might take a bit of a hit in BB and football the first few years in the ACC but are better off in that conference in the long run
No one is being dishonest at all. Their schedule is a DAMN joke. Every year they play at least 6 if not 7 total cupcakes. And no one has said PSU/LSU only plays tough games but their schedules overall are infinitely harder each and every season. And no one has said they duck the competition just that they don't consistently play at the same level. What's so hard to understand?
Originally Posted by Prowler
Put BS in the SEC and they are a muti game loser every season. And this is a common belief.
ACC expansion is about TV markets, not competition.
You implied that Boise played only easy teams and PSU and LSU only hard teams, otherwise you would have posted all of the easy games that PSU/LSU played and not just the difficult ones and you would have posted the difficult opponents for Boise and not just the cupcake teams. What is so hard to understand about that?
Originally Posted by Ghost
And before we go any further your Pitt Panthers are taking a step down in competition ducking the more difficult competition of the Big East. The fact remains the ACC is 2-13 in BCS bowl games the BE is 7-7. The ACC champion gave up 70 points to the Big East champion last season.