Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: Do We Have Too Many DLinemen?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,379

    Do We Have Too Many DLinemen?

    All of a sudden we're more stocked on the DLine than LB. Seems a little odd for a 3-4, doesn't it?

    Hampton, McClendon, Keisel, Heyward, and Hood

    vs

    Timmons, Harrison, Woodley, Foote

    Add in the rookies on each unit and call them a wash for now. Of course we've got Sly and Worlids, but I haven't seen enough out of those 2 yet to know what we have.

    Just seems like we've got more guys on the line and not enough LBs and this is supposed to be a LB's defense. What's going on?

  2. #2
    Benchwarmer Pops8's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    56
    shift to a 4-3 base front.


  3. #3
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,442
    We are stockpiling the DL so when LeBeau goes out the door we can transition to the 4-3. Why else have we been picking up more DL versus LB the last couple of years? LeBeau is the only reason we aren't going to the 4-3 right now.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  4. #4
    Benchwarmer Pops8's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    We are stockpiling the DL so when LeBeau goes out the door we can transition to the 4-3. Why else have we been picking up more DL versus LB the last couple of years? LeBeau is the only reason we aren't going to the 4-3 right now.
    -------JH---------Timmons------Woodley
    --Heywood----Hood-----McClendon-----Kiesel

  5. #5
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Pops8 View Post
    -------JH---------Timmons------Woodley
    --Heywood----Hood-----McClendon-----Kiesel

    Woodley is a 4-3 DE if we would ever shift. Guy would be a beast.

    Timmons would be OLB.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cincitucky (Stinktown, U.S.A.)
    Posts
    3,969
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    Woodley is a 4-3 DE if we would ever shift. Guy would be a beast.

    Timmons would be OLB.
    I really don't know about that. Woodley is awfully short for a 4-3 DE. He plays like a base end but doesn't really have prototypical height or weight for the position. I'm sure he'd be good in a rotation.

    I wouldn't be against switching to a 4-3. And, I agree that Tomlin has hedged his bets a bit with some of the personnel he has taken. But, I'm not sure Woodley is as natural a fit at 4-3 end as you suggest.
    Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

  7. #7
    Benchwarmer Pops8's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo View Post
    Woodley is a 4-3 DE if we would ever shift. Guy would be a beast.

    Timmons would be OLB.
    Yes, I thought about that as a possibility as well. But in that scenario, who do you put at MLB? Certainly not Foote I hope.

    Of course its all piss in the wind...it isn't going to happen. Its just pissin' in the wind conversation (and I am feeling quite damp.)

  8. #8
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,002
    We're thin at DL.

  9. #9
    Legend RuthlessBurgher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the Rubber Meets the Road (in NEPA)
    Posts
    21,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Crash View Post
    We're thin at DL.
    As long as Casey Hampton remains on our roster, we'll never be accused on being thin at DL.

  10. #10
    Legend hawaiiansteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hawaii 5-0
    Posts
    15,146
    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher View Post
    As long as Casey Hampton remains on our roster, we'll never be accused on being thin at DL.
    good point, but Chris Hoke has certainly gotten thin (this pic taken at recent OTAs)


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •