According to Bouchette:
If this is true, Wallace really needs to adjust his expectations. That said, I'm still fine with the Steelers keeping him for two more years -- this year with the tender, next year with the tag, and then taking the third round comp pick when he walks.Ed: Wallace Wants More than Fitz?
Thursday, 22 March 2012 07:40
Written by Ed Bouchette
Maybe the reason no team has either signed Mike Wallace or come close to it is his asking price.
This morning comes a report from Matt Barrows of the Sacramento Bee that San Francisco 49ers inquired about Wallace in the first week of free agency but were taken aback by his asking price. Wallace supposedly wants more than Larry Fitzgeralds eight-year, $120 million contract!
Heres the story: http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archiv...llace-but.html