
Originally Posted by
steelz09
I think I'll write in Ron Paul. I was really disappointed with the way the media handled the debates. Paul wasn't given a chance IMO. He wasn't necessarily the best speaker and he wasn't a "media" darling like Newt and Romney. It was like a big chore for the media to give him Paul airtime compared to the others.
I really think Paul understood the complex issues and actually provided resolutions to such problems. People may not agree with them but at least he stood his ground and provided his true thoughts and DETAILED resolutions. The problem was, a lot of Americans #1 couldn't comprehend the complex problems and #2 understand his sometimes complex answers. Instead, they buy into the "hot air" resolutions provided by other candidates like:
"We need to cut the budget" --- Duhh, but how?
"We need to bring our troops back home" --- Duhh, but how?
"We need to remove our dependency on foreign oil" --- Duh, but how?
Anybody can say that and EVERYBODY understands that. I respected Paul not because I agreed with all of his views. I respected Paul because he actually provided detailed answers to complicated questions.
Bookmarks