What was your take on the overturned Heath catch?

[NW Steeler]

I thought Ben needed to make that throw!!

I agree. Ben made a lot of clutch plays yesterday, but he was definitely off. That throw was one of several. Not complaining though, without Ben we are not in the SB...AGAIN!!!!

[aggiebones]

He was sooo wide open that Ben just pushed it funny. That stuff happens alot to NFL QBs not used to seeing a guy so open.

[SidSmythe]

I thought Ben needed to make that throw!!

I agree. Ben made a lot of clutch plays yesterday, but he was definitely off. That throw was one of several. Not complaining though, without Ben we are not in the SB...AGAIN!!!!

I think throwing touch passes w a glove on is tricky.
When you let it fly it comes out much better, but on touch passes, i think it's hard to make them throws

[feltdizz]

At first I thought it was a good catch but on the reverse angle it looks like the ball bounced off the ground. I wish he would have thrown the ball like that in the second half when Sanders or Brown was wide open.

[pittpete]

I just got home from Pittsburgh and rewatched the first half.
I dont see where the ball ever touched the ball.
Call on the field was a catch and it has to be indisputable evidence to overrule.
I didnt see it.

[Tomlinator]

It looked similar to one of the Packer interceptions earlier in the day. DB hit the ground, ball moved around. They upheld it on review.

Similar situations, two different outcomes.

[flippy]

the ball hit the ground and heath had his hand under it the whole time, but the ball readjusted after he rolled over and that lead me to believe that was the reason it wasn't a catch. i assume they thought he didn't have control after the roll over.

[Dee Dub]

There wasn't enough to overturn in IMO.

As soon as that jerk Nantz started rooting for it to be overturned, as he of course saw it differently than Simms, I knew we were screwed.