Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Umpire positioning problem

  1. #1
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,541

    Umpire positioning problem

    Is there any reason why they just can't employ one more guy who is mainly in charge of spotting the ball? Then, the ump can stay in his correct position, the ball can still be spotted accordingly, and the Peyton Mannings of the world will be happy.
    Guys and gals,
    If you play fantasy football, go to the FF forum here and read my thread. I'd appreciate some feedback on it.

  2. #2

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe
    Is there any reason why they just can't employ one more guy who is mainly in charge of spotting the ball? Then, the ump can stay in his correct position, the ball can still be spotted accordingly, and the Peyton Mannings of the world will be happy.
    This dumb rule affects every team, not just Manning's team.

  3. #3
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,541

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by cruzer8
    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe
    Is there any reason why they just can't employ one more guy who is mainly in charge of spotting the ball? Then, the ump can stay in his correct position, the ball can still be spotted accordingly, and the Peyton Mannings of the world will be happy.
    This dumb rule affects every team, not just Manning's team.
    Of course... I'm just saying Manning as prime example. You want me to name every QB in football?
    Guys and gals,
    If you play fantasy football, go to the FF forum here and read my thread. I'd appreciate some feedback on it.

  4. #4

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe
    Quote Originally Posted by cruzer8
    Quote Originally Posted by Shoe
    Is there any reason why they just can't employ one more guy who is mainly in charge of spotting the ball? Then, the ump can stay in his correct position, the ball can still be spotted accordingly, and the Peyton Mannings of the world will be happy.
    This dumb rule affects every team, not just Manning's team.
    Of course... I'm just saying Manning as prime example. You want me to name every QB in football?
    My point was that it's a dumb rule and should be changed for the benefit of every QB. I have no problem with Manning and Polian complaining about this rule.

  5. #5
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,042

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    While the rule may be iffy I've never been a fan of the Peyton "hurry up and try to get a penalty on the other team" type of football.

    The offense already gets a bunch of advantages and I think this may be a way of letting the D get set.

  6. #6
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Stuart, FL
    Posts
    9,215

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by feltdizz
    While the rule may be iffy I've never been a fan of the Peyton "hurry up and try to get a penalty on the other team" type of football.

    The offense already gets a bunch of advantages and I think this may be a way of letting the D get set.
    Snapping the ball before the D can shift is not trying to get a penalty on them.

    I hate this rule and have from the first snap with the umpire behind the RB.

  7. #7
    Legend fordfixer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    State of confusion
    Posts
    7,568

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Rule change draws ire of elite QBs
    Mike Pereira
    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/NFL- ... re-to-stay

    Updated Aug 30, 2010 10:14 PM ET

    Three full weeks into the NFL’s preseason, we’ve already seen two of the NFL’s elite quarterbacks, Peyton Manning and Drew Brees, test the limits of the new rule that repositions the umpire and places him in the offensive backfield.

    In Thursday’s 59-24 loss to the Packers, the Colts quarterback was penalized twice for illegal snaps when center Jamey Richard snapped the ball to Manning before umpire Garth DeFelice was in position. The calls cost Indianapolis five yards each time.

    “It certainly doesn’t seem like they took some of the things that we do and other teams do into account when they make the rule,” Manning said after the game. “I’m not a big fan of it right now.”

    Brees – another quarterback who utilizes a fast-moving, quick snap attack on offense – also has been penalized for snapping the ball before the umpire was in position, drawing two of these “false start” calls in Friday’s 36-20 preseason victory over the Chargers.

    Good news for Manning and Brees: The referees and umpires will meet in Dallas on Friday, September 10 following the NFL's Thursday night kickoff opener between the Vikings and Saints. They’ll discuss this new positioning change, along with other issues.

    The new rule positions the umpire from his previous spot behind the middle linebacker, four or five yards off the line of scrimmage, to the offensive backfield, where he is stationed 12 to 15 yards deep and set to the left of the quarterback and opposite the referee.

    The rule was put in place to protect the umpire from frequent collisions in what traditionally is a high-traffic area during play.

    Before, the umpire placed the football and stepped back into his spot behind the linebackers. Now that he has to maneuver through a crowd of offensive players and hustle at least 15 yards to be in position, does an up-tempo quarterback like Manning have a legitimate complaint if the official seemingly impedes his no-huddle offense?

    Not at all. This is the rule that was put in place. And Colts president Bill Polian, a member of the competition committee, was in the meetings. We’ve always said there would be some things that came up in games that we would have to tweak. Even Bill admits himself that we’re going to have to tweak this thing a little bit.

    During Friday’s meeting among the officials, a couple of things have to be decided:

    * How is the quarterback going to be notified that the officials are in position? I don’t agree with what they’re doing right now, which is to have the head linesman or the line judge raise his hand and the quarterback has to look at the sideline. That’s not what he’s used to looking at. He’s used to looking at the defense. So I really think, in my mind, they have to go to the referee and have him give a “chop” of the whistle as soon as he sees that the officials are in their normal position.

    * Then, they have to decide, what is the normal position? To me, the normal position is to just get beyond the deepest back. I think if you do that, and not wait until the guy gets 12 or 15 yards, I think you’ll eliminate the problem.

    Those are the two things they have to address in Dallas: how are you going to notify the quarterback that the officials are in position, and then what is the normal position? If they just shrink it down to say as long as the referee clears the back, I think the problem virtually goes away. In a hurry-up offense, I don’t think you have to wait for the official to get all the way back there.

    In Peyton’s case, he was in shotgun in the first call. And it was close. You just have to make sure you get beyond the quarterback.

    The positioning change, which was approved unanimously by the NFL’s competition committee, will be enforced throughout the regular season. But the preseason is an opportunity for the NFL to analyze, meet and possibly make adjustments. Colts coach Jim Caldwell understands that and he’s hoping there is room to accommodate a fast-moving offense like the one his team runs.

    “It didn’t work well for us (Thursday) night on a couple of occasions,” Caldwell said, “so we hope in the evaluation process they’ll find some middle ground, give us an opportunity to use our offense like we’ve done for a number of years.”


    For now, teams have to adjust to this new rule. The only guy that can change the rule is Commissioner Roger Goodell himself, if he wanted to change it. But I don’t think he’s going to want to do that.

    It’s one of those things that I don’t think is as big of an issue as it’s turned out to be in Week 3 of the preseason. Everybody is trying to feel their way around.

    I think when the referees and the umpires get together later this week, and when the competition committee probably has a phone meeting about it, they’ll figure it out. They’ll get it set up more quickly.

    And it will all get ironed out.

    Molon labe

    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. George Orwell



    American metal pimped by asiansteel
    Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you 1. Jesus Christ, 2.The American G.I., One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

  8. #8

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by fordfixer
    Rule change draws ire of elite QBs
    Mike Pereira
    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/NFL- ... re-to-stay

    Updated Aug 30, 2010 10:14 PM ET

    Three full weeks into the NFL’s preseason, we’ve already seen two of the NFL’s elite quarterbacks, Peyton Manning and Drew Brees, test the limits of the new rule that repositions the umpire and places him in the offensive backfield.

    In Thursday’s 59-24 loss to the Packers, the Colts quarterback was penalized twice for illegal snaps when center Jamey Richard snapped the ball to Manning before umpire Garth DeFelice was in position. The calls cost Indianapolis five yards each time.

    “It certainly doesn’t seem like they took some of the things that we do and other teams do into account when they make the rule,” Manning said after the game. “I’m not a big fan of it right now.”

    Brees – another quarterback who utilizes a fast-moving, quick snap attack on offense – also has been penalized for snapping the ball before the umpire was in position, drawing two of these “false start” calls in Friday’s 36-20 preseason victory over the Chargers.

    Good news for Manning and Brees: The referees and umpires will meet in Dallas on Friday, September 10 following the NFL's Thursday night kickoff opener between the Vikings and Saints. They’ll discuss this new positioning change, along with other issues.

    The new rule positions the umpire from his previous spot behind the middle linebacker, four or five yards off the line of scrimmage, to the offensive backfield, where he is stationed 12 to 15 yards deep and set to the left of the quarterback and opposite the referee.

    The rule was put in place to protect the umpire from frequent collisions in what traditionally is a high-traffic area during play.

    Before, the umpire placed the football and stepped back into his spot behind the linebackers. Now that he has to maneuver through a crowd of offensive players and hustle at least 15 yards to be in position, does an up-tempo quarterback like Manning have a legitimate complaint if the official seemingly impedes his no-huddle offense?

    Not at all. This is the rule that was put in place. And Colts president Bill Polian, a member of the competition committee, was in the meetings. We’ve always said there would be some things that came up in games that we would have to tweak. Even Bill admits himself that we’re going to have to tweak this thing a little bit.

    During Friday’s meeting among the officials, a couple of things have to be decided:

    * How is the quarterback going to be notified that the officials are in position? I don’t agree with what they’re doing right now, which is to have the head linesman or the line judge raise his hand and the quarterback has to look at the sideline. That’s not what he’s used to looking at. He’s used to looking at the defense. So I really think, in my mind, they have to go to the referee and have him give a “chop” of the whistle as soon as he sees that the officials are in their normal position.

    * Then, they have to decide, what is the normal position? To me, the normal position is to just get beyond the deepest back. I think if you do that, and not wait until the guy gets 12 or 15 yards, I think you’ll eliminate the problem.

    Those are the two things they have to address in Dallas: how are you going to notify the quarterback that the officials are in position, and then what is the normal position? If they just shrink it down to say as long as the referee clears the back, I think the problem virtually goes away. In a hurry-up offense, I don’t think you have to wait for the official to get all the way back there.

    In Peyton’s case, he was in shotgun in the first call. And it was close. You just have to make sure you get beyond the quarterback.

    The positioning change, which was approved unanimously by the NFL’s competition committee, will be enforced throughout the regular season. But the preseason is an opportunity for the NFL to analyze, meet and possibly make adjustments. Colts coach Jim Caldwell understands that and he’s hoping there is room to accommodate a fast-moving offense like the one his team runs.

    “It didn’t work well for us (Thursday) night on a couple of occasions,” Caldwell said, “so we hope in the evaluation process they’ll find some middle ground, give us an opportunity to use our offense like we’ve done for a number of years.”


    For now, teams have to adjust to this new rule. The only guy that can change the rule is Commissioner Roger Goodell himself, if he wanted to change it. But I don’t think he’s going to want to do that.

    It’s one of those things that I don’t think is as big of an issue as it’s turned out to be in Week 3 of the preseason. Everybody is trying to feel their way around.

    I think when the referees and the umpires get together later this week, and when the competition committee probably has a phone meeting about it, they’ll figure it out. They’ll get it set up more quickly.

    And it will all get ironed out.
    Well, if the "elite" QBs speak up, look for a change to be made. They run the league, anyway.

  9. #9
    Backup
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Central PA.
    Posts
    488

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    While the rule may be dumb in terms of on the field play, it had to be done.
    Need to protect the referee that was smack in the middle of the defense,
    and getting run over/hurt. Or they were in the way of a short pass, and players bitched 'cause they could not catch the ball.
    This way, they are out of the way of all players - offense and defense. And they are protected as well.

  10. #10
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,042

    Re: Umpire positioning problem

    Quote Originally Posted by stlrz d
    Quote Originally Posted by feltdizz
    While the rule may be iffy I've never been a fan of the Peyton "hurry up and try to get a penalty on the other team" type of football.

    The offense already gets a bunch of advantages and I think this may be a way of letting the D get set.
    Snapping the ball before the D can shift is not trying to get a penalty on them.

    I hate this rule and have from the first snap with the umpire behind the RB.
    I have no problem with snapping before the D shifts but Manning also tries to catch teams when they are substituting. If Manning completes a 20 yard pass and then they sub 3 guys on the field while running up to the line the D should have a chance to adjust IMO. When they do Manning is snapping the ball to get a quick 5 yards.

    I think this rule (while protecting the ump) is also in place to slow the game down alittle and help out the D for a change.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •