Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

  1. #1
    Legend hawaiiansteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Hawaii 5-0
    Posts
    15,862

    Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    May 11, 2010



    Bryant McFadden, right, knocks the ball away that was intended for Houston Texans' Andre Johnson.




    I think it is clear that Bryant McFadden was universally welcomed back to Pittsburgh after William Gay had quite a difficult time filling in for him last year. Thousands of fans were ecstatic that the Steelers could get him back for only a fifth round pick. Although, you have to wonder why, a player who played so well for Pittsburgh in a Superbowl campaign, was given away, after only a year, for so cheap.

    Personally, I hate seeing players depart from Pittsburgh after having a good year. I do not hold it against them that they wanted to "get that money man", but I still hate seeing them leave. Generally, I will follow their progression with their new club for a few years after leaving. Over the last few years, it was difficult to see Alan Faneca tear it up with multiple Pro Bowls for the Jets, Joey Porter get double digit sacks in Miami, and Plaxico Burress help the Giants topple the undefeated Patriots in the SB. Okay, maybe that last one was not difficult to watch at all, but not having those guys playing for us was. Therefore, when McFadden was yanked away by Pittsburgh West I kept a good eye on him out there. And to put it gently, McFadden had a really awful year. So, after that type of year, why would the Steelers have any interest in Bryant? And why did he have such a horrible year?

    First and foremost, lets think about the style of defense that B-Mac plays. He is not a cover corner that can just shut a player out like Darrelle Revis. So he will not be the guy who stays with a WR throughout his route or be the guy to stay inside the receiver's shoes down field. No, he is a physical corner that likes to hit. His strengths are re-routing receivers and tackling in the open field. This is quite evident when you see that the career completion percentage against him is 60.9%. Last year the league average was around 61% and I would say a good comp% is 55 and under (about 40 DBs under that mark last year). Conversely, look at his YAC/Rec, which is absurdly low at 4.5, and consider that he has only missed 6 tackles in his professional career. To put a reference on how silly both of those numbers are, contemplate that Revis's YAC/Rec was over 10 last year and consider that no other CB, that was targeted over 100 times last year, had less than 5 missed tackles to B-Mac's 3. To conclude, McFadden is a sure-tackling, physical DB who is dependent on a good pass rush to force the QB to throw sooner.

    Both the Pittsburgh Steelers and Arizona Cardinals run a 3-4 defense. It is important to note that the Whiz brought the 3-4 to the desert and has attempted to model his defense after Pittsburgh's defense. However, they do not run exactly the same system, primarily because Arizona does not have Dick LeBeau's brilliant mind. Therefore, I initially presumed that B-Mac struggled so much on his new team because of a bad pass rush. In 2008, the Steelers had a God-like 51 sacks and 91 QB hits, numbers that could make any CB's job easier by keeping the QB off his game. However, when I looked up the 2009 Cardinal's numbers I found that they had 43 sacks and 77 QB hits, good for the 6th best QB pressuring team in the league. I believe we can safely conclude that it was not a lack of pass rush that hampered his game.

    All statistics can be misleading if you do not consider how those numbers were accumulated. In my hypothesis, I believe that B-Mac's deficient year can be accredited to two differences between the Steelers defense and the Cardinals defense. First of all, lets take a look at who was racking up all of those sacks for both teams. In 2008, these Steelers had 2 or more sacks: James Harrison (16), LaMarr Woodley (11.5), Aaron Smith (5.5), Lawrence Timmons (5), James Farrior (3.5), and Travis Kirschke (2). In 2009, Cardinals with 2 or more sacks included Calais Campbell (7), Darnell Dockett (7), Bertrand Berry (6), Clark Haggans (5), Chike Okeafor (4.5), Kenny Iwebema (2), Will Davis (2), Alan Branch (2), and Adrian Wilson (2). If we group all of the sacks together we can see that the Steelers had 38.5 sacks from LBs (specifically 27.5 from their OLBs) and 11.5 from their defensive line. Comparatively, the Cards had 12.5 sacks from LBs and 26 sacks from their DL.

    That shows quite a difference in where each team is expecting their sacks to come from. The Steelers depend on their fast OLBs to get around the edge and hit the Quarterback as quickly as possible. On the other side, the Cardinals want their defensive line to push its way through the OL and collapse the pocket around the quarterback. How does this affect the play of a CB? Well, there is no way I can prove this, but I believe an OLB can get to the QB a lot faster than a DL. The faster the defender gets to the QB the less time the WR has to break free from the CB and get down field. Ergo, McFadden thrived when the Steelers OLBs got to the QB quickly and struggled with the more methodical pocket-collapsing Arizona defense.

    My second belief is that it appears that the Cardinals do not run a zone blitz or that they do not run a zone blitz as creative as the Steelers. I saw an interview with Peyton Manning once, I believe it was right before that epic playoff game in 2005, where he stated that he hated playing the Steelers defense. He explained that when he played them he always had to take an extra second or so to read the blitz and make a throw. He explained that LeBeau hid his blitzes so well that it made his job harder. Before a play starts, a good QB can pick out parts of the field that may be open based on what the average defense is presenting. However, since a zone-blitz disguises who will blitz and who will drop back a QB really has no idea where the soft spots in the zone will be. The QB has to take that extra split second to decide post snap where those spots are, which gives a blitz more time to get there. Clearly, any CB, specifically a weaker cover-corner like McFadden, would benefit greatly from the LeBeau zone blitz.

    We are happy to have McFadden back in the black and gold, and I am sure he is just as happy to be back. Here is to hoping he has a better year back in our system...or at least a better year than William Gay had.


    http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/20 ... #storyjump

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cincitucky (Stinktown, U.S.A.)
    Posts
    4,026

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    At the risk of offending someone on our board who may have written this article, I think it is rubbish. All of those facts to prove a hypothesis that he admits he can't prove and has no real evidence to back up.
    Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

  3. #3
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,731

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    The bottomline is that any DB in our defense is going to look bad if the pass rush isn't getting to the QB. Our defense is not designed for our DB to run stride for stride with WRs. It is designed to get pressure on the QB and force them to throw the ball before routes develop and dump it to receivers running short hot routes with our DB keeping the ball in front of them and making tackles for short gains. In our defense, the front seven is more important than the back four. If the former doesn't do their job, the latter look very bad like last year.

    What happened last year in our losses was that we weren't getting to the QB therefore the Wrs had time to get separation in the secondary. That is why we drafted two young OLBs in rounds 2 and 4 versus everybody's wish for DBs. The coaches and the FO know what makes this defense work.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,755

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo
    The bottomline is that any DB in our defense is going to look bad if the pass rush isn't getting to the QB. Our defense is not designed for our DB to run stride for stride with WRs. It is designed to get pressure on the QB and force them to throw the ball before routes develop and dump it to receivers running short hot routes with our DB keeping the ball in front of them and making tackles for short gains. In our defense, the front seven is more important than the back four. If the former doesn't do their job, the latter look very bad like last year.

    What happened last year in our losses was that we weren't getting to the QB therefore the Wrs had time to get separation in the secondary. That is why we drafted two young OLBs in rounds 2 and 4 versus everybody's wish for DBs. The coaches and the FO know what makes this defense work.
    $$$$ i agree 100%. the zone blitz isnt an ideal system for a cb in the sense that they rely on the pass rush to make them look good. i love the zone blitz but when there is no qb pressure it hangs the cb's out to dry.

  5. #5

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    In other words, we'd better hope that Worlids and Gibson are just what the doctor ordered to fix the ailing pass rush? Because they are the only players added to really address that need. I wonder how much either of them will actually see the field this season?

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,755

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Quote Originally Posted by BradshawsHairdresser
    In other words, we'd better hope that Worlids and Gibson are just what the doctor ordered to fix the ailing pass rush? Because they are the only players added to really address that need. I wonder how much either of them will actually see the field this season?
    a healthy A.smith will help out the pass rush a lot and hopefully a better season from james harrison and timmons wouldnt hurt either. i wouldnt count on any of the rookies making a big impact this season. i dont know if gibson can play st's but i think worlids will do very well on st's

  7. #7
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,414

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    McFadden is a solid tackler and that's Gay's weakness.

    This defense needs CBs that can prevent the big play and McFadden fits the Steelers CB mold perfectly. Glad he's back.

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer Djfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,403

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Quote Originally Posted by flippy
    McFadden is a solid tackler and that's Gay's weakness.

    This defense needs CBs that can prevent the big play and McFadden fits the Steelers CB mold perfectly. Glad he's back.

    $
    Steel City Mafia
    So Cal Boss (Ret)
    http://www.anewsong.com


    My son's first Kansas Turkey!

  9. #9
    Legend
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    13,731

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by BradshawsHairdresser
    In other words, we'd better hope that Worlids and Gibson are just what the doctor ordered to fix the ailing pass rush? Because they are the only players added to really address that need. I wonder how much either of them will actually see the field this season?
    a healthy A.smith will help out the pass rush a lot and hopefully a better season from james harrison and timmons wouldnt hurt either. i wouldnt count on any of the rookies making a big impact this season. i dont know if gibson can play st's but i think worlids will do very well on st's
    A better season from Harrison would absolutley help. Two sacks in the final eight games is not what he needs to deliver.

    Timmons was not the problem. If anything he greatly improved the ability to get to the QB by adding the dimension of the inside blitz. Timmons had 7 sacks and 4 forced fumbles from the ILB position last season as a 22 year old first year full-time starter. And that was missing 2 games due to injury and playing hurt in a couple others.

    The best totals that James Farrior ever had in his career were 6.5 sacks and 3 forced fumbles (not in same season). The best totals larry Foote ever had were 4 sacks and 3 forced fumbles.

    Yet we continue to hear that Timmons needs to get better. The argument gets more ridiculous every time it is stated.
    Playing Fantasy Football does not qualify you to be the in the front office or on the coaching staff of the Pittsburgh Steelers. They are professionals and you are not!

  10. #10
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Inside Your Head
    Posts
    10,414

    Re: Bryant McFadden: A Closer Look at His Lone Season in Arizona

    Quote Originally Posted by Oviedo
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by BradshawsHairdresser
    In other words, we'd better hope that Worlids and Gibson are just what the doctor ordered to fix the ailing pass rush? Because they are the only players added to really address that need. I wonder how much either of them will actually see the field this season?
    a healthy A.smith will help out the pass rush a lot and hopefully a better season from james harrison and timmons wouldnt hurt either. i wouldnt count on any of the rookies making a big impact this season. i dont know if gibson can play st's but i think worlids will do very well on st's
    A better season from Harrison would absolutley help. Two sacks in the final eight games is not what he needs to deliver.

    Timmons was not the problem. If anything he greatly improved the ability to get to the QB by adding the dimension of the inside blitz. Timmons had 7 sacks and 4 forced fumbles from the ILB position last season as a 22 year old first year full-time starter. And that was missing 2 games due to injury and playing hurt in a couple others.

    The best totals that James Farrior ever had in his career were 6.5 sacks and 3 forced fumbles (not in same season). The best totals larry Foote ever had were 4 sacks and 3 forced fumbles.

    Yet we continue to hear that Timmons needs to get better. The argument gets more ridiculous every time it is stated.
    Totally agree on Timmons. I think Keisel and Timmons are the unsung heroes of this defense. And I think both had super high expectations in their first full seasons because they were spectacular in backup roles.

    No one has Timmons burst. And no other big 3-4 DE has Brett Keisel's speed/athleticism.

    In fairness to Harrison, he was injured and playing with one arm at the end of last season. There were several times he couldn't wrap someone up and you could really see that he was hurting.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •