Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

  1. #1
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hey Roger...
    Posts
    3,039

    Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    Jumped right in front of us to do it!






    http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/angryasian07/SIGNATURES/DOS2.jpg
    Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, hear the lamentations of their women.

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,516

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    That's what I thought when I saw the pick. Anyone have some first hand insight on Worilds (e.g. a VT alum who watches them play a lot)?
    Guys and gals,
    If you play fantasy football, go to the FF forum here and read my thread. I'd appreciate some feedback on it.

  3. #3
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,755

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hey Roger...
    Posts
    3,039

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount
    I realize they need a RB just like we do but where does a bull like Gerhart fit when they have a bull like AP? We are the ones that needed that bull!!
    http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/angryasian07/SIGNATURES/DOS2.jpg
    Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, hear the lamentations of their women.

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,755

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    Quote Originally Posted by Discipline of Steel
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount
    I realize they need a RB just like we do but where does a bull like Gerhart fit when they have a bull like AP? We are the ones that needed that bull!!
    i liked gerhart a lot but we can still get blount at least. he isnt as big but he is faster than gerhart

  6. #6
    Legend RuthlessBurgher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the Rubber Meets the Road (in NEPA)
    Posts
    21,104

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by Discipline of Steel
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount
    I realize they need a RB just like we do but where does a bull like Gerhart fit when they have a bull like AP? We are the ones that needed that bull!!
    i liked gerhart a lot but we can still get blount at least. he isnt as big but he is faster than gerhart
    Not quite...They are close, but Blount is actually listed as being bigger than Gerhart (they are both 6' tall, but Blount is listed at 238 while Gerhart is listed at 231).

    Gerhart had a faster 40 time than Blount at the Combine (4.62 vs. 4.53) but Blount managed to match Gerhart's 4.53 at his Pro Day.

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hey Roger...
    Posts
    3,039

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by Discipline of Steel
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount
    I realize they need a RB just like we do but where does a bull like Gerhart fit when they have a bull like AP? We are the ones that needed that bull!!
    i liked gerhart a lot but we can still get blount at least. he isnt as big but he is faster than gerhart
    Not quite...They are close, but Blount is actually listed as being bigger than Gerhart (they are both 6' tall, but Blount is listed at 238 while Gerhart is listed at 231).

    Gerhart had a faster 40 time than Blount at the Combine (4.62 vs. 4.53) but Blount managed to match Gerhart's 4.53 at his Pro Day.
    So how does Dwyer compare with these guys?
    http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/angryasian07/SIGNATURES/DOS2.jpg
    Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, hear the lamentations of their women.

  8. #8
    Legend RuthlessBurgher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the Rubber Meets the Road (in NEPA)
    Posts
    21,104

    Re: Why would Minnesota take Gerhart?

    [quote=Discipline of Steel]
    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by "Discipline of Steel":veng0vye
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    they picked gerhart because they lost chester taylor. i wanted gerhart pretty bad but i just hope we get blount
    I realize they need a RB just like we do but where does a bull like Gerhart fit when they have a bull like AP? We are the ones that needed that bull!!
    i liked gerhart a lot but we can still get blount at least. he isnt as big but he is faster than gerhart
    Not quite...They are close, but Blount is actually listed as being bigger than Gerhart (they are both 6' tall, but Blount is listed at 238 while Gerhart is listed at 231).

    Gerhart had a faster 40 time than Blount at the Combine (4.62 vs. 4.53) but Blount managed to match Gerhart's 4.53 at his Pro Day.
    So how does Dwyer compare with these guys?[/quote:veng0vye]

    Height: 5-11.
    Weight: 229.
    Combine 40 Time: 4.59.
    Pro Day 40 Time: 4.52.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •