Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Mel Kiper: Steelers' Rounds 1-4 picks

  1. #21
    Hall of Famer Sugar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,087

    Re: Mel Kiper: Steelers' Rounds 1-4 picks

    Quote Originally Posted by birtikidis
    Quote Originally Posted by Sugar
    The point is that Gay just isn't NFL starter material. Let's get someone who will be and will be dominant. The OL doesn't really concern me much. Now that we've lost our top receiver in YPC we may not be making as many long developing plays anyway.
    so they're gonna scratch the playbook since tone is gone.
    even though HE wasn't the deep threat...
    and you think hartwig is a starter "material" even though he is consistently
    rated as one of the worst (if not the worst) center in the NFL.. in nearly every
    category.
    Um, Tone had the largest YPC on the team. They won't scratch the playbook but they just won't have the options they had with Tone AND Wallace AND Ward on the field.[/quote]

    Holmes had 79 catches for 1,248 yards and 5 TD's. That's a 15.8 yards per catch average.

    Wallace had 39 catches for 756 yards and 6 TD's. That's a 19.4 yards per catch average.

  2. #22
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,683

    Re: Mel Kiper: Steelers' Rounds 1-4 picks

    tone may have had the highest YPC on the team
    but he wasn't the deep threat. or did you not watch the games?
    Tone ran a ton of underneath stuff and had a ton of YAC.
    Wallace was our deep threat.
    http://jeromiandbrittany.blogspot.com/

    Earn Some Bitcoins


    PBMining

    http://www.qoinpro.com/91f8fc96f7dfd461f6483ab3950deccc

    I am paying for my honeymoon using bitcoins.
    1PQsjF9rQqEWF8RfPzczyqCW6ULu1nZ3iu

  3. #23
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Akron, OH
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Mel Kiper: Steelers' Rounds 1-4 picks

    I prefer Pouncey! He would improve our interior offensive line which would improve our running game which by proxy would improve our defense b/c we would have better time of possession which would keep our defense off the field!
    <a href=http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=6946&dateline=1338146203 target=_blank>http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums...ine=1338146203</a>

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •