http://firebrucearians.com/Originally Posted by pfelix73
HOLY SHNIKIES!!!!!Originally Posted by Djfan
They scored running a regular offense and the no huddle. There are risks and rewards involved with running the no huddle. I suppose the risks involved are why the coaches don't want to run it more often.
Everytime I see this thread it makes me think of this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Mie9hhQ ... re=related
Alright, SD Steel,Originally Posted by sd steel
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see a connection. A little insight please?
Ben wants more no-huddle....Ben wants more Cow-bell. Just reminds me of this skit everytime I read the title.Originally Posted by Djfan
[quote=sd steel]Ben wants more no-huddle....Ben wants more Cow-bell. Just reminds me of this skit everytime I read the title.[/quote:2lwq30ee]Originally Posted by Djfan
I got a fever, and the only prescription is more no-huddle!
Do you really think our success rate would stay the same if we went no huddle all game? It's no different them those who want Heath to get mega touches every game.
Both are successful because we don't over use them.
I don't think anyone's suggesting we start running our own K-Gun and go no-huddle all game long. However, 1, 2, or even 3 series, when it's clearly our best offensive package is seriously underutilizing it.Originally Posted by feltdizz
They probably average running the no-huddle at least 2 series a game. I am not so sure the no-huddle is the team's best package. Need more evidence to make that determination. I know that a majority of the points they scored came out of the offenses they run outside the no-huddle. The biggest area they need to clean up on are the player mistakes. They left a lot of points off the score board in the "regular offenses" due to player mistakes.Originally Posted by Flasteel