Originally Posted by
Oviedo
Do you think Redman is a great player and the staff is just deliberately not playing him because they want to struggle? It must be that or they are incompetent and can't see talent watching a player at practice very single day.
I think Tomlin is not so stupid as to have missed the short-yardage ability of Redman, as displayed against first-team NFL defenses both in practices and exhibition games. I think Tomlin doesn't want to bring Redman up until Redman can take on the role of a blocking back and be a significant contributor on special teams as well. I think Tomlin doesn't think a roster spot should be devoted to a player who is only a short-yardage back. I also think Tomlin would understandably be a bit biased toward the guys he drafted, and hoped would be able to do the job of short-yardage back. I think he would naturally give them preference over the undrafted rookie.
Here's my take:
--So far, the Steelers haven't shown that ANY of the backs besides Redman can be
effective in short yardage situations. As other posters have pointed out, they've
been downright PITIFUL in that regard.
--So far, Frank Summers has been just about useless as a blocking back...hard to see
Redman doing any worse than Summers has.
--We need to have a back who can be dependable in short-yardage situations...even if
he is, for now, a one-dimensional player (we've spent roster spots on kickers,
punters, long-snappers, and kick-returners, all of whom are pretty much
one-dimensional).
--All of which leads me to ask, what would be so harmful about giving Redman a
CHANCE to show what he can do as our short-yardage runner?
And what's so bad about putting another starter on special teams, if necessary? James Harrison played STs all last season--it didn't seem to hurt his playing production any.
If we have to have a starter play STs to move Redman up to the active roster, I say, let's go for it. IMO, the best ST players should be playing STs, whether they are starters or not.
Bookmarks