I mean that SB was tight. Even though we pulled it out.
I mean that SB was tight. Even though we pulled it out.
1. Sepulveda > Berger
2. Logan > everyone else we tried
3. Sweed + Wallace > Washington
4. Timmons > Foote
5. Essex > Stapleton and Simmons
6. 2009 Tomlin > 2006 Cowher
"My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"
Just to add the negatives to be fair... :POriginally Posted by Oviedo
Big Snack in decline (see article on why not to keep him)
Timmons is injured
Mendenhall is still unknown
Parker is healthy, but only carried the ball 4 times in pre-season
New right guard
Just sayin...it isn't all roses
Pappy
1.20 - JC Latham, OT, Alabama
2.51 - Xavier leggette, WR, South Carolina
3.84 - Sedrick Van-Pran Granger, OC, Georgia
3.98 - Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky
4.119 - Maason Smith, DT, LSU
7.178 -
7.195 -
"Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount
7. Big Snack, Skippy, FWP, Clark, Colon all in contract years. Players always step it up during last year of their deals.Originally Posted by Oviedo
8. Big Ben, as long as he is the QB Steelers always have a chance.
Sepulveda and Logan.
Everybody, great points...
You have to factor negatives with the positives for it to mean anything. I do think we have gotten better, most dramatically, in ST's. Logan/Sepulveda is a monstrous upgrade.
I do agree that we do have some player decline, and I do agree that contract players won't/shouldn't slip excessively. Frankly, the only "weakness" as I see it, is the running game/O-line.
Sorry as I am to say it: FWP is a shell of what he was (I think we ran the wheels off him that one year), and the O-line is, well... the O-line. (i.e. not good)
I wasn't hired for my disposition.
Originally Posted by papillon
Mendenhall being an unknown is big, since, there's only 4 RBs on the roster.Originally Posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o.
They can add packages all they want for Hampton, his play is slipping. He was able to be blocked by one guy in the preseason and other teams had success running the football against the first team defense this preseason.
Parker and Mendenhall coming back from injury and with Summers never having played in an NFL game only leaves Moore as a known quantity. That's never an ideal situation.
Missing a lineman form an offensive line that everyone is hoping will gel due to playing a year together is a big deal. They have to work a new guard into their schemes, protections and game plan. It's a step backward.
Pappy
1.20 - JC Latham, OT, Alabama
2.51 - Xavier leggette, WR, South Carolina
3.84 - Sedrick Van-Pran Granger, OC, Georgia
3.98 - Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky
4.119 - Maason Smith, DT, LSU
7.178 -
7.195 -
"Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount
i'm not going to lie, i think our running game will struggle early on in the season...our passing game is going to have to pick up the slack and i think we can...we have a lot of weapons at wide, ben's on his A game, as long as we can keep D's off balanced we'll be fine.
"The standard is the standard" Mike Tomlin
I'm not saying that Mendenhall and Parker are not big factors, I'm saying that it is no different than last year in that regard.Originally Posted by papillon
Mendenhall was unavailable for 3/4 of the year, and did nothing notable before that. Parker was hurt and largely ineffective through most of the season.
As far as the OL, the missing RG IMO is more than compensated by the fact that each of the other 4 have spent time together and the newbie has been on the team and practiced in the system. It looked like Essex was the front runner whether Stapleton got hurt or not.
And going back to your first point, I'll take Lebeau's opinion over anyone on this board. If he wants Hamp on the field more, I'm okay with it.
Bookmarks