Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60

Thread: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

  1. #31
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Quote Originally Posted by steelers43
    Quote Originally Posted by Flasteel
    Quote Originally Posted by steelers43
    Quote Originally Posted by Flasteel
    I can't find any punt return stats. Please tell me we didn't take a guy who has no experience returning punts. My three areas of highest need going in were the interior offensive line, defensive end and a return specialist, so I'm very happy. But punt return is a more glaring need than kick return with Mewelde Moore on the roster. If Wallace isn't that guy, I think this is a pretty bad pick.
    Moore can return punts. IIRC, he led the league a few years ago in punt returns.
    I believe you do remember correctly 43 and that's one of the reasons I was excited to get him (Moore) last year. That said, he couldn't separate himself for us and we even went with Holmes for a spark in that area.

    I was just really hoping for an electric punt return guy and he's never even sniffed a return...disappointing from that perspective. What happened to that midget from Arizona?

    Tomlin needs to stop bouncing players around. It's his biggest downfall imo. He moves the OL around like ping pong balls, returners, corners, etc. You have to let them develop and get in rhythm, especially on the OL, secondary and returning.

    Moore will be fine or Wallace. Just make a freaking decision and stick with it.
    I can't really say Tomlin bouncing guys around is a bad thing since we just won a SB....

    People said Holmes at PR was a bad thing.. but look how it helped us in the playoffs...

    I think Tomlin is smart enough to know that in this NFL... you have to be flexible.
    I lost a bet about Najee gaining 1300 yards.

    "Our head coach has failed to win a playoff game for seven years in a row. His game day strategy, culture of divas, in game decisions, clock management, player evaluation, hires, and affinity with sub par starters at RB, P, and OL are holding the Steelers back. That standard remains the standard"



  2. #32
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    [url="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/559250"]http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/559250[/url]

  3. #33
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Kid sounds like Nate Washington II

  4. #34
    Pro Bowler

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    I love this pick if he can be a return man as a rookie. Genius pick if thats the case

  5. #35
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Quote Originally Posted by flippy
    Kid sounds like Nate Washington II
    That comparison makes a lot of sense, except this guy also has return ability.

  6. #36
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    What is the difference between Wallace, taken in the third round, and Darrius Heyward-Bey, who was taken 7th overall?
    Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

    Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

    We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

    We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

  7. #37
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher
    What is the difference between Wallace, taken in the third round, and Darrius Heyward-Bey, who was taken 7th overall?
    i dont think there is much difference. i have seen a lot of bey over the years and i have never been too impressed. i thought he was a bit of a reach late in the first round nevermind the 7th overall pick

  8. #38
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Quote Originally Posted by frankthetank1
    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher
    What is the difference between Wallace, taken in the third round, and Darrius Heyward-Bey, who was taken 7th overall?
    i dont think there is much difference. i have seen a lot of bey over the years and i have never been too impressed. i thought he was a bit of a reach late in the first round nevermind the 7th overall pick
    That is what I thought as well. And we get Wallace 77 picks after Bey. Top 7 money vs. 3rd round money too.
    Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

    Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

    We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

    We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

  9. #39
    Legend

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    Quote Originally Posted by RuthlessBurgher
    What is the difference between Wallace, taken in the third round, and Darrius Heyward-Bey, who was taken 7th overall?

    good call

  10. #40
    Hall of Famer

    User Info Menu

    Re: 84 - Mike Wallace, WR

    [url="http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80f354dd"]http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80f354dd[/url]
    @_Hellgrammite

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •