Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

  1. #11
    Oracle
    Guest

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    jhansle-

    i think i understand what you're saying and i agree. we have been paying him too much money to be a back up for the last two years and could've picked someone at 1.15 who would've been a full time starter at another position. however, i don't think you can blame the front office for making a 'mistake' in drafting him. remember at the time, we had just released joey porter, and james harrison had never shown any signs of the superstar he was to become. even our own coaching staff who watched him every day were shocked at his production once he was given the opportunity. in a 3-4 defense, the weak side linebacker is your biggest playmaker. you can't gamble and hope that an UFA with no starting experience (harrison) can carry your defense. you have to draft the best OLB available and that was timmons.

    i don't think it was so much an issue of timmons taking too long to develop. i think he was just stuck behind a surprising new starter they hadn't/couldn't anticipate. much like when the chargers drafted phillip rivers only to have drew brees emerge as a pro-bowler. only we didn't trade our 'drew brees'... we extended him.

    now the question is what do we do with timmons? i see two good options. first of all, let him play out his current contract at ILB and see how he does. if he shows he can adjust to that position effectively, we re-sign him long term and save our draft pick. (i think that's what the FO is hoping for). if he shows he can't adjust, we trade him in his final year and get a new draft pick while also saving money to extend our other starters. in the meantime, remember, james harrison WILL get hurt at some point this season. WHEN he does, timmons should be able to step in without losing too much. he's not as strong as harrison, but he's much quicker and better in pass coverage. timmons could literally save us a game or two and preserve home field for the playoffs, and that alone will be worth the 1.15 pick.

    in hindsight, had we known harrison would emerge, sure we would've gone with a different pick. but that's not a bad problem to have. mitch berger is a bad problem to have. willie colon is a bad problem to have.

  2. #12
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,118

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    Quote Originally Posted by jhansle1
    One thing that bothers me about Timmons is how long it's taking him to develop. Yes, he's still young but you have to think of it from a business perspective.

    By the time Timmons "breaks out" and possibly becomes a pro bowler, he's going to be an UFA. At that time, him and Rosenhaus may ask for mega bucks which is unfair to be honest because the Steelers paid him 1.15 money for all these years as he "developed". From a business perspective, the Steelers haven't gotten their return on investment from a 1st rounder. Their paying him top dollar (1.15) money to develop. Then, when he develops into the potential pro bowler that he may become, his contract is up and then he'll probably ask for mega bucks....

    So, if that happens, can they afford to keep Woodley and Timmons now that Harrison got all that money?

    Easily one of the more ill-logical things I've read on this message board. You have to be kidding. First off since when do the Steelers draft players and require that they step right in and play? The Steelers drafted Timmons knowing that he wouldn't need to be thrown in to the lineup. He was groomed and had a great seasons last year. Now he's ready to really step in to the lineup and light it up and it's taken too long? How many rookies actually come in and contribute immediately? and how many take a year or two before coming in to their own? If he continues to progress he'll be worth the megabucks and we should be thankful we have his a$$.

  3. #13
    Administrator steelz09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    3,461

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    Quote Originally Posted by Snatch98
    Quote Originally Posted by jhansle1
    One thing that bothers me about Timmons is how long it's taking him to develop. Yes, he's still young but you have to think of it from a business perspective.

    By the time Timmons "breaks out" and possibly becomes a pro bowler, he's going to be an UFA. At that time, him and Rosenhaus may ask for mega bucks which is unfair to be honest because the Steelers paid him 1.15 money for all these years as he "developed". From a business perspective, the Steelers haven't gotten their return on investment from a 1st rounder. Their paying him top dollar (1.15) money to develop. Then, when he develops into the potential pro bowler that he may become, his contract is up and then he'll probably ask for mega bucks....

    So, if that happens, can they afford to keep Woodley and Timmons now that Harrison got all that money?

    Easily one of the more ill-logical things I've read on this message board. You have to be kidding. First off since when do the Steelers draft players and require that they step right in and play? The Steelers drafted Timmons knowing that he wouldn't need to be thrown in to the lineup. He was groomed and had a great seasons last year. Now he's ready to really step in to the lineup and light it up and it's taken too long? How many rookies actually come in and contribute immediately? and how many take a year or two before coming in to their own? If he continues to progress he'll be worth the megabucks and we should be thankful we have his a$$.
    You are missing my point. My point isn't along the lines of Timmons needing time to develop. I get it. I'm kind of pissed that they "thought" he was an OLB and that wasn't the right fit and then they moved him to ILB to "see" if he'd fit in that role. However, thats a different story.

    My comments are regarding money. I have a feeling that when his rookie contract is up, he'll possibly be a pro bowl player. How is that a knock on him again? But I feel that his last year of his rookie contract will be that "break out" year for him (i.e. the pro bowl year). He'll begin his peaking at that time.

    However, I have a hunch that Timmons and his agent will want top 5 LB money. Why? Because he'll be in his mid-twenties and starting to peak. He'll want that money because Timmons (and his agent) will know that it'll probably be his biggest payday. Because his third contract will be somewhere around 30 (or so). The 2nd contract typically is the largest.

    To me, the contract isn't warrented. Woodley's 2nd contract should outweight Timmons because of PRODUCTIVITY (NOT CEILING) IMO but I don't think it'll be the case. Woodley will probably have hit his ceiling (or damn close to it) and Timmons will just be starting to peak. It just seems unfair that someone that is "developing" will be getting paid MORE than someone that is producing at a higher level just because of their possible ceiling.

  4. #14
    Administrator steelz09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    3,461

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    I just think that we could see a possible conflict when Timmons' first contract is up. I think they'll want to negotiate based on "possible ceiling" rather than productivity throughout his first contract. To me, that's what is bothering me and I have a feeling this scenario could play out.

    If his second contract demands are based on his productivity throughout his first contract (which may include 1 pro bowl year - just a guess) then I think we'll get a FAIR deal done.

    If it's based on what he'll do in the future well then I could see a holdout and possible Timmons on another team for his second contract. If that happens, I would consider the Timmons pick a bad draft pick. Why? Because you don't spend that amount of time and resources (i.e. MONEY) developing a player during their EARLY years and then have them go elsewhere during their prime. I don't think it'll come down to that (and it shouldn't). That's why I say we'll see a lot about Timmons and his character when the time comes.

  5. #15

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    The people who question whether or not we should have taken Timmons must have not watched much of the season last year. Timmons was huge on 3rd down. Timmons was able to match-up and blanket tight ends and running backs, which allowed Troy to sit back in deep coverage.

  6. #16
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hey Roger...
    Posts
    3,072

    Re: Steelers LB Timmons could be hard to keep out

    Quote Originally Posted by Oracle
    in the meantime, remember, james harrison WILL get hurt at some point this season. WHEN he does, timmons should be able to step in without losing too much. he's not as strong as harrison, but he's much quicker and better in pass coverage.
    That may be true...but James Harrison netted the greatest play in Super Bowl history when he dropped back into coverage. and remember the interviews during Super Bowl week. Harrison was shooting his mouth off about how he was disappointed the coaches were telling him he would be dropping into coverage more during that game. I thought he was just talking BS to throw the Cardinals a curve. Turns out, he almost 'predicted' what ultimately happened.

    Timmons will perform this year and his new contract (or lack thereof) will be based on what he achieves. No worries mon
    http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/angryasian07/SIGNATURES/DOS2.jpg
    Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, hear the lamentations of their women.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •